Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:11:44.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Mobility Modes in Polymer Solutions Undergoing Thermal-Induced Phase Separation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Philip K. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Biology and Chemical EngineeringRyerson University350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 2K3
Get access

Abstract

The thermal-induced phase separation method is used to fabricate polymer membranes and polymer-dispersed liquid crystal films from polymer solutions. The resultant morphology consists of solvent droplets dispersed uniformly in a solid polymer matrix. Up till now, the modeling and computer simulation of the thermal-induced phase separation phenomenon in polymer solutions have considered the mobility to be a constant. The objective of this presentation is to compare the following three mobility modes: (1) mobility as a constant, (2) mobility following fast mode theory, and (3) mobility following slow mode theory. We present computer simulation results from models composed of the Cahn-Hilliard theory for phase separation, Flory-Huggins free energy density for polymer solutions, and the three aforementioned mobility modes. The numerical results indicate that there is no significant difference in the morphology formed; the only difference occurs in the phase separation time. Furthermore, the numerical results show that the only difference between the slow and fast mode theories is a factor of two; the mobility of the fast mode theory is twice that of the slow mode theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Doane, J.W., in Liquid Crystals: Applications and Uses, Vol. 1, edited by Bahadur, B. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990) Chapter 14.Google Scholar
2. Matsuyama, H., Berghmans, S. and Lloyd, D.R., Polymer, 40, 2289 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Gunton, J.D., Miguel, M. San and Sahni, P.S., in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8, edited by Domb, C. and Lebowitz, J.L. (Academic Press, New York, 1983) pp. 267482.Google Scholar
4. Chan, P.K. and Rey, A.D., Macrol. Theory Simul., 4, 873 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Cahn, J.W., J. Chem. Phys., 42, 93 (1965).Google Scholar
6. Kramer, E.J., Green, P. and Palmstrom, C.J., Polymer, 25, 473 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Cowie, J.M.G., Polymers: Chemistry & Physics of Modern Materials, 2nd ed. (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1991) pp.157168.Google Scholar
8. Elias, H.-G., An Introduction to Polymer Science (VCH, New York, 1997) pp. 266270.Google Scholar