Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:07:25.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of Lattice-Matched GaInNAs and Metamorphic InGaAs Photodetector Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Homan B. Yuen
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Seth R. Bank
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Mark A. Wisteyy
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Xiaojun Yu
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Junxian Fu
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Zhilong Rao
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
James S. Harris Jr
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Solid State Research Lab, 420 Via Palou, Stanford, CA 94305-4070, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The dilute-nitride GaInNAs shows great promise in becoming the next choice for 1 eV photodetector and multi-junction photovoltaic applications due to the ability for it to be grown lattice-matched on GaAs substrates. This paper will present results from high-power photodetector devices fabricated from high-quality thick GaInNAs and metamorphic InGaAs materials grown by MBE. The internal quantum efficiency of rear-illuminated PIN photodiodes with thick GaInNAs films as the intrinsic region (roughly 62% at 1064 nm) is somewhat lower than comparable metamorphic InGaAs devices (roughly 75% at 1064 nm). However, the dark current density of the GaInNAs devices is also somewhat lower (roughly 3 μA/cm2 at 2×104 V/cm bias) than the InGaAs devices (roughly 20 μA/cm2 at 2×104 V/cm bias), while the breakdown voltages (beyond -20 V) are comparable. Materials characterization of each structure, including x-ray diffraction and room-temperature as well as temperature-dependent photoluminescence studies will be presented in order to explain the characteristics observed in the devices composed of the two different material systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 King, R.R et al., 19th European Photovolt. Solar Energy Conf., Paris, France, 2004.Google Scholar
2 Friedman, D.J., Geisz, J.F. and Ptak, A.J., in Optoelectronic Properties of Semiconductors and Superlattices, Vol. 21: Physics and Applications of Dilute Nitrides, edited by Buyanova, I.A. and Chen, W.M. (Taylor and Francis, New York, 2004), pp. 371393.Google Scholar
3 , Romanato et al., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 47484755 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Eldredge, J.W., et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13(2), 689691, (1995).Google Scholar
5 Pinault, M.A. and Tournie, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1391 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Jackrel, D., Yuen, Homan, Fu, Junxian, Bank, Seth, Yu, Xiaojun, Rao, Zhilong, and Harris, James S., 31st IEEE Photovolt. Specialists Conf. Proceedings, 2005.Google Scholar