Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:36:47.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Heat-Pulse and Furnace Isothermal Anneals of Be Implanted InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

B. Molnar
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375;
G. Kelner
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375;
G.L. Ramseyer
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375;
G.H. Morrison
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853;
S. C. Shatas
Affiliation:
AG Associates, Palo Alto, CA 94303
Get access

Abstract

Annealing in the 600–900°C temperature range, using either a halogen lamp for periods of seconds or a furnace for periods of minutes, has been applied to activate Be implanted InP samples. The Be was ion-implanted at room temperature into InP substrates. The substrates were uncapped and in close contact with another smooth surface during annealing.

It was found that in the 1017–1019/cm3 range, the acceptor concentration increased with the temperature of anneal. It was also found that redistribution effects decreased with decreasing anneal time. For short anneals, the optimum condition for an 80–90% activation in the 1017–1018/cm3 range was estimated to be 10 seconds at 950°C. It was also found that after rapid anneal, the carrier concentration profile closely approximated the asimplanted Be profile. In the case of 1018–1019/cm3 implants, which were rapidly annealed, there was a low concentration component (1016–1017/cm3) to the redistribution; this ancillary component to the main active distribution was detected by SIMS and was electrically inactive. For long term annealing this electrically inactive Be component was partly converted to substitutional Be and became electrically active. Rapid thermal annealing eliminated this conversion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES:

1. Devlin, W.J., Ip, K.T., Leta, D.L., Eastman, L.F., Morrison, G.H., and Comas, J., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 45, 510 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Donnelly, J.P. and Armiento, C.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 96 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Boos, J.B., Dietrich, H.B., Weng, T.H., Sleger, K.J., Binari, S.C., and Henry, R.L., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-3, 256 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Oberstar, J.D., Streetman, B.G., Baker, J.E., and Williams, P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 1312 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Molnar, B., Kelner, G., Ramseyer, G.O., and Morrison, G.H., Electrochem. Soc. Meeting, Extended Abstrat #361, May 1983, to be published.Google Scholar
6. Sedgewich, T.O., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 484 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Tell, B., Bjorkholm, J.E., and Bebe, E.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 655 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Davis, D.E., Kennedy, E.F., Comer, J.J., and Lorenzo, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 922 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Gill, S.S., Sealy, B.J., Topham, P.J., Barrett, N.J., and Stephens, K.G., Electron. Lett. 17, 623 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Lile, D.L., Collins, D.A., and Zeisse, C.R., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-4 231 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Masum Choudbury, A.N.M., Tabatabaie-Alivi, K., and Fonstad, C.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 381 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Molnar, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 927 (1980).Google Scholar
13. HEATPULSE system of AG Associates.Google Scholar
14. Gat, A., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-2, 15 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Manning, I. and Mueller, G.P., Computer Phys. Commun. 7, 85 (1974).Google Scholar
16. Seidel, T.E. and MacRae, A.U., Trans. Met. Soc. A.I.M.E. 245, 491 (1969).Google Scholar