Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:10:28.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Film Quality and Step Coverage for Silicon Dioxide Dielectrics Formed by RTCVD Using Tetraethoxysilane and Silane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D. S. Miles ,
G. S. Harris ,
D. Venables ,
M. R. Mirabedini ,
J. J. Wortman ,
D. M. Maher  and
J. R. Hauser
D. S. Miles
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
G. S. Harris
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
D. Venables
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
M. R. Mirabedini
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
J. J. Wortman
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
D. M. Maher
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
J. R. Hauser
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Raleigh, N. C. 27695
Get access

Abstract

Rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD) oxides formed using TEOS and oxygen (O2) are compared with RTCVD oxides formed using silane (SiH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). These oxides were deposited under varying pressure and gas composition to investigate the film step coverage and electrical properties. Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used in determining the oxide step coverage. Excellent oxide conformality, greater than 90 %, was achieved with SiH4 and N2O over a wide range of aspect ratios. The average breakdown field obtained for the SiH4/N2O oxides is approximately 13 MV/cm, which is greater than values measured for oxides formed by conventional dry thermal process. Oxides deposited using TEOS typically have an average breakdown field of about 8 MV/cm. We conclude that the SiH4/N2O oxide process for the deposition of SiO2 films in a RTCVD reactor is a very promising candidate for sidewall spacer formation in advanced device applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 338: Symposium – Materials Reliability in Microelectronics IV , 1994 , 43
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cheng, L-Y., McVittie, J. P. and Saraswat, K. C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58 (19), 2147 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Cale, T. S., Raupp, G. B. and Gandy, T. H., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 3645 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Cooke, M. J. and Harris, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 7, 3217 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Chang, C. P., Pai, C. S. and Hsieh, J. J., J. Appl. Phys., 67, 2119 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Selamoglu, N., Mucha, J. A., Ibbotson, D. E. and Flamm, D. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 7, 1345 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Adams, A. C. and Capio, C. D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126 (6), 1042–46 (1977).Google Scholar
7. Bayoumi, A. M., Silvestre, C. L., Kuehn, R. T. and Hauser, J. R., “Design and Operation of a Cluster-Tool-Based Rapid Thermal Processing Module”, Tenth Biennial University/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium, p. 203 (May 1993).Google Scholar
8. Ren, X., Oztiirk, M. C. and Wortman, J. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10 (3), 1081–85 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Xu, X-L., Kuehn, R. T., Wortman, J. J. and Oztfirk, M. C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 60 (24), 3063 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Becker, F. S., Pawlik, D., Anzinger, H. and Spitzer, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 5 (6), 1555 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Becker, F. S., Pawlik, D., Schafer, H. and Staudigl, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 4 (3), 732 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Monkowski, J. R., Logan, M. A., Freeman, D. W., Brown, G. A. and Ruggles, G. A., Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Chemical Vapor Deposition, p. 508 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Levin, R. M. and Evans-Lutterodt, K., Materials Letter 1 (1), 29–32 (1982).Google Scholar
14. Wulu, H. C., Saraswat, K. C., and McVittie, J. P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (6), 1831–40 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Cheng, L-Y., Rey, J. C., McVittie, J. P. and Saraswat, K. C., Proceedings of the Seventh International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (N. Y., 1990), p. 404.Google Scholar