Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:17:09.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of Electrochemical Performance of Double Perovskite REBaCo2O5+x Cathodes in Symmetrical Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Wenquan Gong
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Houston, Chemistry, Houston, Texas, United States
Manoj Yadav
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Houston, Chemistry, Houston, Texas, United States
Allan J. Jacobson
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Houston, Chemistry, Houston, Texas, United States
Get access

Abstract

The segregated vacancies in the A site-ordered oxygen-deficient double perovskites REBaCo2O5+x (RE = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu) (RBCO) are thought to greatly enhance the diffusivity of oxide ions in the bulk of these materials and possibly supply surface defect sites with enhanced reactivity towards molecular oxygen. Some materials in this family of REBaCo2O5+x compounds, such as PrBaCo2O5+x, (PBCO), have already demonstrated high electronic conductivity, rapid oxygen ion diffusion and surface exchange kinetics. Therefore, the family of REBaCo2O5+x compounds were synthesized and evaluated as cathode materials for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) based on gadolinium doped ceria (CGO) electrolytes. The electrochemical performance of symmetrical cells (REBaCo2O5+x + CGO composite cathodes on the CGO electrolytes) was evaluated by using AC impedance spectroscopy. The area specific resistance (ASR) performance was measured as a function of temperature as well as oxygen partial pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ivers-Tiffee, E., Weber, A., Herbstritt, D., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 21, 1805 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Perry Murray, E., Sever, M. J., Barnett, S. A., Solid State Ionics 148, 27 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Skinner, S. J., Kilner, J. A., Solid State Ionics 135, 709 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Bassat, J. M., Boehm, E., Grenier, J. C., Mauvy, F., Dordor, P., Pouchard, M., Fifth European Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Forum 1–5, 586 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Zhou, W., Lin, C. T., Liang, W. Y., Adv. Mater. 5, 735 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Troyanchuk, I. O., Kasper, N. V., Khalyavin, D. D., Szymczak, H., Szymczak, R., Baran, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3380 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Maignan, A., Martin, C., Pelloquin, D., Nguyen, N., Raveau, B., J. Solid State Chem. 142, 247 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Anderson, P.S., Kirk, C.A., Knudsen, J., Reaney, I.M., West, A.R., Solid State Sciences 7, 1149 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Streule, S., Podlesnyak, A., Mesot, J., Medarde, M., Conder, K., Pomjakushina, E., Mitberg, E. and Kozhevnikov, V., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 3317 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Kim, G., Wang, S., Jacobson, A. J., Reimus, L., Brodersen, P., and Mims, C. A., J. Mater.Chem. 17, 2500 (2007).Google Scholar
11. Shannon, R. D., Acta Cryst. A32, 751 (1976).Google Scholar