Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:17:04.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Structure/Property Relationships of Langmuir-Blodgett and Spin-Cast Films of an Amphiphilic, Regioregular Polythiophene Polymer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jusroop Mattu ,
Thomas Johansson ,
Steven Holdcroft  and
Gary W. Leach
Jusroop Mattu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Simon Fraser University, Chemistry, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada, 778 782 8072, 604 291 3765
Thomas Johansson
Affiliation:
[email protected], Simon Fraser University, Department of Chemistry, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
Steven Holdcroft
Affiliation:
[email protected], Simon Fraser University, Department of Chemistry, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
Gary W. Leach
Affiliation:
[email protected], Simon Fraser University, Department of Chemistry, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The effects of structural conformation and order on materials properties and reactivity in thin films of an amphiphilic, regioregular polythiophene π-conjugated polymer (πCP) derivative are presented. Thin films deposited by the Langmuir Blodgett technique provide highly ordered anisotropic films compared to those deposited by spin cast methods. Large differences in both the thermal reactivity and physical properties of the films are observed.

Keywords

polymerphotochemicalthin film
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 949: Symposium C – Smart Dielectric Polymer Properties, Characterization and Their Devices , 2006 , 0949-C02-07
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fairley, P. Chemical Week June 3, 1998, p. 42.Google Scholar
2. Sirringhaus, H.; Tessler, N.; Friend, R. H. Science 1998, 280, 1741–1744.Google Scholar
3. Xu, B.; Holdcroft, S. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 4457–4460.Google Scholar
4. Chen, T.; Wu, X.; Rieke, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 233–244.Google Scholar
5. Lowe, R. D.; McCullough, R. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 70–72.Google Scholar
6. Handbook of Organic Conductive Molecules and Polymers: Vol. 4; Conducing Polymers: Transport, Photophysics and Applications. Nalwa, H. S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Chen, T.; Rieke, D. Synthetic Metals, 1993, 60, 175–177.Google Scholar
8. Greenham, N. C.; Friend, R. H. In Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook; Mark, J. E., Ed.; AIP Press: Woodbury, N. Y., 1996; 479–487.Google Scholar
9. Sirringhaus, H.; Brown, P. J.; Friend, R. H.; Nielsen, M. M.; Bechgaard, K.; Langeveld-Voss, B. M. W.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Janssen, R. A. J.; Meijer, E. W.; Herwig, P.; de Leeuw, D. M. Nature 1995, 401, 685–688.Google Scholar
10. Yu, J.; Holdcroft, S. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3705–3714.Google Scholar
11. Mattu, J.; Johansson, T.; Holdcroft, S.; Leach, G. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 15328–15337.Google Scholar
12. Kikteva, T.; Star, D.; Zhao, Z.; Baisley, T. L.; Leach, G. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1124–1133.Google Scholar
13. Bolognesi, A.; Bertini, F.; Provasoli, A.; Villa, D.; Ahumada, O. Thin Solid Films 1996, 289, 129–132.Google Scholar
14. Yu, J.; Holdcroft, S. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5073–5079.Google Scholar