Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:55:55.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Study of Solid-Phase Crystallization of Amorphous Silicon Deposited by Hot-wire CVD, Plasma-Enhanced CVD, and Electron-Beam Evaporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Paul Stradins
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Enregy Laboratory, NCPV, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO, 80401, United States, 3033846774
Oliver Kunz
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N/A, Australia
David L. Young
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Yanfa Yan
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Kim M. Jones
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Yueqin Xu
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Robert C. Reedy
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Howard M. Branz
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Armin G. Aberle
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N/A, Australia
Qi Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Get access

Abstract

Solid-phase crystallization (SPC) rates are compared in amorphous silicon films prepared by three different methods: hot-wire chemical vapor deposition (HWCVD), plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), and electron-beam physical vapor deposition (e-beam). Random SPC proceeds approximately 5 and 13 times slower in PECVD and e-beam films, respectively, as compared to HWCVD films. Doping accelerates random SPC in e-beam films but has little effect on the SPC rate of HWCVD films. In contrast, the crystalline growth front in solid-phase epitaxy experiments propagates at similar speed in HWCVD, PECVD, and e-beam amorphous Si films. This strongly suggests that the observed large differences in random SPC rates originate from different nucleation rates in these materials while the grain growth rates are relatively similar. The larger grain sizes observed for films that exhibit slower random SPC support this suggestion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Green, M. A., Basore, P. A., Chang, N., et al., Sol. Energy 77 (2004) 857.Google Scholar
2 Bergmann, R. B., Shi, F. G. and J. Krinke, 80 (1998) 1011.Google Scholar
3 Boyce, J. B., Fulks, R. T., Ho, J., et al., Thin Solid Films 383 (2001) 137.Google Scholar
4 Aberle, A. G., J. Cryst. Growth 287 (2006) 386.Google Scholar
5 Basore, P. A., 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (2005) 967.Google Scholar
6 Stradins, P., Young, D. L., Yan, Y., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 121921.Google Scholar
7 Young, D. L., Stradins, P., Xu, Y., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 161910.Google Scholar
8 Spinella, C., Lombardo, S. and Priolo, F., J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 5383, and references therein.Google Scholar
9 Roth, J. A., Olson, G. L., Jacobson, D. C., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (1990) 1340.Google Scholar
10 Ahrenkiel, S. P., Roy, B., Mahan, A. H., et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 910 (2006) 175.Google Scholar
11 Ahrenkiel, S. P., (2007), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, private communication.Google Scholar