Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:43:18.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Study of Different Rapid Annealing Techniques on Electrically Active Defects in Unimplanted Gallium Arsenide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

G. Marrakchi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière, INSA, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cédex. France.
G. Guillot
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière, INSA, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cédex. France.
A. Nouailhat
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière, INSA, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cédex. France. CNS, CNET, Chemin du Vieux-Chêne, B.P 98, 38243 Meylan, France.
Get access

Abstract

The present paper describes the evolution of native defects and the introduction of new defects by transient annealing on unimplanted Bridgman (B) or Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) Gallium Arsenide (GaAs). Three techniques covering all the timescales below those available with the conventional furnace annealing were used: Pulsed Electron Beam Annealing (PEBA), Continuous Wave Laser (CWLA) and Rapid Thermal Annealing (RTA). Electronic defects have been investigated by Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS). The evolution of native defects and the introduction of new defects, are strongly dependent on the annealing technique. A significant decrease of EL2 concentration has been observed after PEBA, but it is not affected by CWLA or RTA under our annealing conditions. On the contrary, the other native defects EL6 and EL3 are completely annealed by RTA and PEBA. Furthermore, both DLTS spectra recorded after PEBA and RTA on the B substrates show introduction of new defects. However, CWLA does not affect the defects present in B GaAs, but an electron trap termed PL1 was introduced by this treatment in a thin oxide layer formed on the LPE grown GaAs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Sedgwick, T., J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid-State Sci. Technol. 130,484 (1983).Google Scholar
2.Tsu, R., Baglin, J-E., Lasher, J.G and Tsang, J.C, A.I.P Conference Proceedings, (A.I.P. New York), 50, 623 (1978).Google Scholar
3.Nissim, Y. and Gibbons, J.F., Laser and Electron beam Solid interactions and Materials Processing. Gibbons, J.F., Hess, L.D. and Sigmon, T.W. Ed. (Amsterdam North-Holland, 1980), p.275.Google Scholar
4.Marrakchi, G., Rosencher, E., Gavand, M., Guillot, G. and Nouailhat, A., Revue Phys. Appl.to be published (1987).Google Scholar
5.Martin, G. M., Mitonneau, A., and Mircea, A., Electron. Lett. 13, 191 (1977).Google Scholar
6.Marrakchi, G., unpublished.Google Scholar
7.Marrakchi, G., Barbier, D., Guillot, G. and Nouailhat, A., J. Appl. Phys., 62(7), 2742(1987).Google Scholar
8.Von Bardeleben, H.J., Stievenard, D.Deresmes, D., Hubert, A. and Bourgoin, J.C., Phy. Rev. B 34, 7192 (1986).Google Scholar
9.Kuzuhara, M. and Nozaki, T., J. Appl. Phys. 52(9), 3131 ( 1986).Google Scholar
10.Katayama, M., Usami, A. and Wada, T., J. Appl. Phys. 62(2), 528 (1987).Google Scholar