Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:43:52.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cocation Effects in Rhodium-Exchanged Y Zeolites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. K. Shoemaker ,
R. A. Johnson  and
T. M. Apple
R. K. Shoemaker
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Chemistry, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304
R. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Chemistry, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304
T. M. Apple
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of Chemistry, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304
Get access

Abstract

Magic-angle spinning 13C NMR spectra of carbon monoxide adsorbed on rhodium/Y zeolites yield information about the proportioning of CO in the various possible adsorption states; linear, bridged and dicarbonyl. The relative amounts of these adsorbed types, particularly the ratio of bridged to linear CO is influenced by the nature of the majority cations present with the rhodium. Reduced Rh-Na(+) and Rh-Li(+) zeolites form all three CO surface species, while acidic Rh zeolites, formed by the introduction of the co-cations Ca(2+) and H(+), exhibit no bridged carbonyls. The suppression of the bridged moiety results from the withdrawal of electrons from rhodium by the acid centers making the metal electron deficient (more oxidized).

Rh(I) dicarbonyl species form on all samples studied, however these species are indistinguishable from the linear monocarbonyls based solely upon the isotropic chemical shift obtained from magic-angle spinning. The number of dicarbonyl species can be quantitatively determined by the Carr- Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence, the powder pattern or by selective exchange experiments. At room temperature the two CO molecules in the gemdicarbonyl appear to undergo a mutual hopping exchange. This motion is frozen out at 198K. The carbon-carbon internuclear separation in the gemdicarbonyl is 3.3 Å.

Catalysts pre-adsorbed with 13CO undergo exchange of the dicarbonyl species upon exposure at 198 K to 12CO, however they also react to form 13CO2. When exposed to CO at room temperature no CO2 formation is detected.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 111: Symposium O – Microstructure and Properties of Catalysts , 1987 , 113
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rabo, J. A., Shomaker, V. and Pickert, P. E., Proc. 3rd Intl. Cong. Catalysis, Vol.2 (North Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, 1965), p. 1264.Google Scholar
2. Gallezot, P., Datka, J., Massardier, J., Primet, M. and Imelik, B. in Proc. 6th Intl. Cong. Catalysi, edited by Bond, G. C., Wells, P. B. and Tompkins, F. C. (The Chemical Society 2, London, 1977) p. 696.Google Scholar
3. Gallezot, P., Weber, R., Betta, R. A. Dalla and Boudart, M., Z. Naturforsch, 34a, 40 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Henrici-Olive, G. and Olive, S., Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Carbon Monoxide, (Springer-Verlag Publishers, Berlin, 1984), p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gleeson, J. W. and Vaughan, R. W., J. Chem. Phys., 78, 5384 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Duncan, T. M., Yates, J. T. Jr., and Vaughan, R. W., J. Chem. Phys., 73, 975 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Shoemaker, R. K. and Apple, T. M., J. Phys. Chem., 89, 3185 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Slichter, C. P., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 37, 25 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Shoemaker, R. K. and Apple, T. M., J. Magn. Reson., 67, 367 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Herzfeld, J. and Berger, A. E., J. Chem. Phys., 73, 6021 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yates, J. T. Jr., Duncan, T. M., Worley, S. D. and Vaughan, R. W., J. Chem. Phys., 70, 1219 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Van't Blik, H. F., Van Zon, J. B. A. D., Huizinga, T., Vis, J. C., Konigsberger, D. and Prins, R., J. Chem. Phys., 87, 2264 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Robbins, J. L., J. Phys. Chem., 90, 3381 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar