Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:25:04.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charge Carrier Transport in the Bulk and at the Surface of Nanoparticles: A Quasi-Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dennis Friedrich  and
Marinus Kunst
Dennis Friedrich
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Institute Solar Fuels, Berlin, Germany
Marinus Kunst
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Institute Solar Fuels, Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell is presented, where the conventional liquid electrolyte is replaced by an electrolyte film, reaching a solar light-to-current conversion efficiency of 3%. Contactless transient photoconductance measurements were performed, revealing decay behavior of photoinduced charge carriers, dependent on external applied potential conditions. The measurements show that the decay is controlled by the injection of electrons into the front contact, hindered or enhanced by the field in the space charge region.

Keywords

nanostructurephotovoltaickinetics
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1270: Symposia GG/HH/II – Organic Photovoltaics and Related Electronics-From Excitons to Devices , 2010 , 1270-GG04-14
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 O'Regan, B. and Grätzel, M. Gr, Nature, 353 737–740 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Sommeling, P.M., O'Regan, B.C., Haswell, R.R., Smit, H.J.P., Bakker, N.J., Smits, J.J.T., Kroon, J.M., and Roosmalen, J.A.M. van, J. Phys.Chem. B 110 19191–19197 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Kunst, M. and Beck, G., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3558–3566 (1986).Google Scholar
4 Swiatkowski, C., Sanders, A., Buhre, K., and Kunst, M. Ku, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 1763–1775 (1995).Google Scholar
5 Kunst, M., Goubard, F., Colbeau-Justin, C. Colbeau, and Wünsch, F., Mater. Sci. Eng., C 27, 1061–1064 (2007).Google Scholar