Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T18:06:26.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Al/RuO2 Interface Upon Thermal Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Quat T. Vu ,
E. Kolawa  and
M-A. Nicolet
Quat T. Vu
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
E. Kolawa
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
M-A. Nicolet
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

We have characterized the Al/RuO2 interface after annealing at temperatures in the range 450° C-550° C for durations up to several hours by backscattering spectrometry, cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy, and electrical four point probe measurement of specially designed structures. The electrical measurement yields the specific contact resistance of the interface by applying a transmission line type model developped for this purpose. An interfacial aluminum-oxygen polycrystalline compound is shown to grow with annealing temperature and duration, with a concurrent reduction of a thin layer of RuO2. However, the specific contact resistance between Al and RuO2 is found to decrease with annealing duration at 500°C. This last result indicates that the interfacial reaction does not lead to an insulating interface as could have been expected if the growth were pure and dense A12O3.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 181: Symposium B – Advanced Metallizations in Microelectronics , 1990 , 531
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1- Kolawa, E., So, F.C.T., Pan, E.T-S. and Nicolet, M-A., Appl.Phys.Lett. 50, 854 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2- Krusin-Elbaum, L., Wittmer, M. and Yee, D.S.. Appl.Phys.Lett. 50, 1879 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3- Nieh, C.W., Kolawa, E., So, F.C.T. and Nicolet, M-A., Mat.Lett 6, 177 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4- Charai, A., Hornstrom, S.E., Thomas, O., Fryer, P.M. and Harper, J.M.E., J.Vac.Sci.Technol. A7, 784 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5- Harper, J.M.E., Hornstrom, S.E., Thomas, O., Charai, A. and Krusin-Elbaum, L., J.Vac.Sci.Technol A7, 875 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6- Vu, Quat T., Kolawa, E., Halperin, L. and Nicolet, M-A., submitted to Solid State Electronics.Google Scholar
7- Needes, C.R.S., in Proc.1982 Int. Microelectronics Conf.,1982, Tokyo, Japan pp. 94–101.Google Scholar