Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:23:54.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Sol-Gel Derived Tantalum Oxide Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

L. A. Silverman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. 02139
G. Teowee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. 02139
D. R. Uhlmann
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the densification and dielectric properties of sol-gel derived tantalum oxide thin films as the insulators in MIS capacitors. Hydrolysis of tantalum ethoxide is extremely rapid and goes to completion in ethanol. Condensation is also rapid, and goes to completion in toluene Multiple layers were applied by spin-coating up to thicknesses of 3000 Å before cracking of the coating during drying ensued. Densification occurs from room temperature to 450 C, with the original film thickness decreasing by about half in one hour at 450 C. No additional densification occurs upon heating to 750 C. The dielectric constant decreases from unfired samples to those fired at 450 C, and then increases on firing from 600 to 750 C. The value of the dielectric constant at 1 MHz for samples fired at 750 C for one hour is 20, similar to that of anodically grown Ta2O5. Leakage currents as low as 2 × 10−7 amp cm−2 have been measured for applied fields of 200,000 V cm−1.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refernces

1. Knausengerger, W.H., and Tauber, R.N., J. Electrochem. Soc., 126, 927 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Povlovic, A.S., J. Chem. Phys., 40, 951 (1964).Google Scholar
3. Gerstenberg, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 113, 1542 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Oehrlein, G.S., and Reisman, A., J. Appl. Phys., 54 6502 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Rizkalla, H., and Wellinghoff, S.T., J. Mater. Sci., 19, 3895 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Kimura, S., Nishioka, Y., Shintani, A. and Mukai, K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 130, 2414 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Kaplan, E., Balog, M., and Bentchkowsky-Frohman, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 123, 1570 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Wang, C.C., Zaininger, K.H., and Duffy, M.T., RCA Review, Dec. 1980.Google Scholar
9. Zelinski, B.J.J., and Uhlmann, D.R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 45, 1069 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Bradley, D.C. and Holloway, H., Can. J. Chem., 39, 1818 (1961)Google Scholar
11. Bradley, D.C., Wardlaw, W. and Whiteley, A., J. Chem. Soc., 5, 726(1956).Google Scholar
12. Holloway, C.E., J. Coord. Chem., 1, 253 (1971).Google Scholar
13. Pfalzgraf, L.G., and Reiss, J.G., Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 11, 4348 (1968).Google Scholar
14. Brinker, C.J., and Scherer, G.W., J. Am. Cer. Soc., 69, C12(1986).Google Scholar
15. Von Hippel, A., Dielectric Materials and Applications, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1954).Google Scholar
16. Oehrlein, G.S., d'Heurle, F.M. and Reisman, A., J. Appl. Phys., 55, 3715 (1984).Google Scholar