Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:48:24.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Lead-Iron Phosphate Nuclear Waste Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Edwin Schiewer ,
Werner Lutze ,
Lynn A. Boatner  and
Brian C. Sales
Edwin Schiewer
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-lnstitut für Kernforschung Berlin GmbH, Glienicker Straβe 100
Werner Lutze
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-lnstitut für Kernforschung Berlin GmbH, Glienicker Straβe 100
Lynn A. Boatner
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-ACO5-840R21400.
Brian C. Sales
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-ACO5-840R21400.
Get access

Extract

Lead-iron phosphate glasses have recently been proposed as a new primary disposal medium for both commercial nuclear reactor wastes and some types of high-level radioactive U.S. defense wastes [1–41. The initial work on the characterization of lead-iron phosphate nuclear waste glasses, hereafter named phosphate glasses, concentrated on the preparation, thermal properties, and devitrification behavior (both during and after preparation) of these glasses. Aqueous corrosion rates were measured at 90°C in distilled water, acidic and basic solutions, low eH distilled water, and in the “reference’ natural ground water appropriate to disposal in a tuffaceous formation (i.e., J-13 well water [5]). The results of these initial investigations were extremely encouraging and indicated that homogeneous, highly leach resistant (at 90° C) phosphate glasses loaded with either commercial or high-level U.S. defense wastes could be prepared at relatively low temperatures (process temp.:≤ 1050°C). The chemical stability of the phosphate glasses was found to be primarily due to the stabilizing effect of iron on the structure of lead phosphate glass. This effect is illustrated in Fig. 1 where the leachate conductivity at 90°C is plotted versus time for phosphate glasses with varying iron concentrations. The addition of 9 wt.% iron oxide to lead metaphosphate glass [Pb(PO3)2] increases the chemical durability of the glass in water by a factor of about 104. The tendency of pure lead phosphate glasses to crystallize is also greatly suppressed by the addition of iron oxide [3,4]. Lead metaphosphate glass can be completely crystallized by heating the glass in air at 30O°C for several hours. Lead-iron phosphate glasses, however, can be heated in air for several hundred hours at a temperature as high as 500°C without exhibiting any evidence of crystallization.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 50: Symposium STOCKHOLM – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX , 1985 , 231
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sales, B.C. and Boatner, L.A., Science 226, 45 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Sales, B.C. and Boatner, L.A., Material Lett. 2, 301 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Sales, B.C. and Boatner, L.A., Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL-6168, UC-70, 1985.Google Scholar
4. Sales, B.C. and Boatner, L.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, in press.Google Scholar
5. Oversby, V.M., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-53326, 1982.Google Scholar
6. Sales, B.C., Abraham, M.M., Bates, J.B., and Boatner, L.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 71, 103 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Salis, B.C., Brazell, R.S., Bates, J.B., and Boatner, L.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids - submitted.Google Scholar
8. MCC-1P Static Leach Test Method, Report DOE/TIC-11400, 1981.Google Scholar
9. Report EUR-9772, 1985.Google Scholar
10. Schiewer, E., Radioactive Waste Management, to be published.Google Scholar
11. Sales, B.C., Petek, M., and Boatner, L.A., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, edited by Brookins, D.G. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1983) pp. 251–258.Google Scholar
12. Freude, E., Grambow, B., Lutze, W., Rabe, H., and Ewing, R.C., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R.C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985) pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
13. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstensen, D.C., and Plummer, L.N., Water-Resources Investigations 1980, 80.Google Scholar
14. Van Wazer, J.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 644 (1950)Google Scholar
15. Grambow, B. and Lutze, W., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manaqement II, edited by Northrup, C.J.M. (Plenum Press, New York 1980 pp.109–116.Google Scholar
16. Grambow, B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R.C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985) pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
17. Osterheld, R.K., in Topics in Phosphorus Chemistry VII, edited by Griffith, E.J. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972), pp. 103–254.Google Scholar
18. Lindsay, W.L., Chemical Equilibria in Soils (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979), pp. 329–341.Google Scholar