Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T19:19:31.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Diamond Thin Films by Core-Level Photoabsorption and UV Excitation Raman Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. D. Zuiker ,
A. R. Krauss ,
D. M. Gruen ,
J. A. Carlisle ,
L. J. Terminello ,
S. A. Asher  and
R. W. Bormett
C. D. Zuiker
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
A. R. Krauss
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
D. M. Gruen
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
J. A. Carlisle
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
L. J. Terminello
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
S. A. Asher
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Materials Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
R. W. Bormett
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Materials Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Get access

Abstract

Near-edge x-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and Raman spectroscopies have been used to characterize both nanocrystalline and faceted, microcrystalline diamond thin films grown by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition under a variety of conditions. Raman spectroscopy is perhaps the most commonly used method of characterizing diamond film quality, whereas photoabsorption requires a synchrotron radiation source and is much less commonly used. Both methods characterize the sp2 (graphitic) /sp3 (diamond) electronic bonding character of the films, but Raman spectroscopy is considerably more sensitive to sp2 than sp3 bonded carbon. For nanocrystalline diamond, the use of a visible excitation source for Raman spectroscopy also gives rise to an intense fluorescence band which may completely mask the sp3 Raman line, even in films with negligible (<1%) sp2 bonding character. Near-edge x-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) is a more localized measurement of the electronic bonding character, and does not have as large a variation in sensitivity between sp2 and sp3 phases.

Raman spectra measured using 632.8 nm light exhibit a sharp diamond phonon peak at 1332 cm−1 for faceted, large grain diamond films, and no obvious diamond phonon peak for the nanocrystalline diamond films. However, Raman spectra excited by 228.9 nm light exhibit a sharp diamond phonon peak for both nanocrystalline and large grain, faceted diamond films. The UV Raman results are consistent with the C(ls) NEXAFS measurements which show clear bulk diamond excitonic and sp3 features, with little evidence of sp2 character for all of the tested films. We conclude that the use of visible excitation Raman spectroscopy as the sole criterion for the assessment of quality in nanocrystalline diamond films is misleading, but that UV Raman spectroscopy and NEXAFS provide a consistent and reliable characterization. Nanocrystalline films grown using a fullerene precursor in an Ar microwave plasma with very low levels of hydrogen (2%) are found by both of the latter methods to consist almost entirely of sp3-bonded carbon with ˜2% non-tetrahedral bonding.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 437: Symposium DD – Applications of Synchrotron Radiation to III , 1996 , 211
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Yarbrough, I. W. A. and Messier, R., Science 247, 688 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Wagner, J., Wild, C., and Koidl, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 779 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Bormett, R. W., Asher, S. A., Witowski, R. E., Partlow, W. D., Lizewski, R. and Pettit, F., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 5916 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Stohr, J., NEXAFS, (Springer Verlag, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
5. Chaiken, A., Terminello, L. J., Wong, J., Doll, G. L., and Taylor, C. A. II, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2112 (1993);Google Scholar
6. Terminello, L. J., Chaiken, A., Wong, J., Doll, G. L., and Taylor, C. A. II, Vac, J., Sci. Tech. A 12, 2462 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Yang, X.-Q., Ruckmann, M. W., Skotheim, T. A., Boer, M. den, Zheng, Y., Badzian, A. R., Badzian, T., Messier, R., and Srivatsa, A. R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 1140 (1991);Google Scholar
8. Wang, Y., Chen, H., and Hoffman, R. W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 1153 (1991);Google Scholar
9. Nithianandam, J., Rife, J. C. and Windischmann, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 135 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Capehart, T. W., Perry, T. A., Beetz, C. B., Belton, D. N., Fisher, G. B., Beall, C. E., Yates, B. N., and Taylor, J. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 957 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Gruen, D. M., Liu, S., Krauss, A. R., and Pan, X., J. Appl. Phys 75(3), 1758–1763 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Zuiker, C. D., Krauss, A. R., Gruen, D. M., Pan, X., Li, J. C., Csencsits, R., Erdemir, A., Bindal, C., and Fenske, G., Thin Solid Films 270, 154 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Csencsits, R., Gruen, D. M., Krauss, A. R., and Zuiker, C. D., Optical Engineering Midwest, 2622, 405 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Morar, J. F., Himpsel, F. J., Hollinger, G., Hughes, G., and Jordan, J. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1960 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Batson, P. E., Phys. Rev. B. 48, 2608 (1993).Google Scholar
16. Huang, L. J., Bello, I., Lau, W. M., Lee, S.-T., Stevens, P. A., DeVries, B. D., J. App. Phys. 76, 7483 (1994).Google Scholar