Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:40:29.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Deep Levels in 3C-SiC by Optical-Capacitance-Transient Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Y. Nakakura
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470-0392, Japan
M. Kato
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470-0392, Japan
M. Ichimura
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470-0392, Japan
E. Arai
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470-0392, Japan
Y. Tokuda
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
Get access

Abstract

An optical-capacitance-transient spectroscopy (O-CTS) method was used to characterize the defects in 3C-SiC on Si. The O-CTS measurement enables us to estimate optical threshold energy and optical cross section for the defects. In the O-CTS spectrum, a peak was observed for photon energy hv larger than 0.5 eV. This peak was thought to be due to the ND1 center, which was also observed by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) and found to have a thermal activation energy of 0.37 eV. The optical cross section for the center increased with hv for hv<0.6 eV and then decreased with increasing hv. The apparent optical threshold energy was about 0.47 eV. Another deep levels which have optical threshold energy of around 1.4 eV were also observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dalibor, T., Pensl, G., Matsunami, H., Kimoto, T., Choyke, W. J., Schoner, A. and Nordell, N., Phys. stat. sol. (a), 162, 199 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Kato, M., Ichimura, M., Arai, E., Masuda, Y, Chen, Y., Nishino, S. and Tokuda, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 40, 4943 (2001)Google Scholar
3. Ichimura, M., Koga, Y., Yamada, N., Abe, T., Arai, E. and Tokuda, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, L18 (1998). (In this paper an error was made in calculation of σoo. Although it is given as 6×10-17 cm2, it is correctly 6×10-14 cm2.)Google Scholar
4. Yamada, N., Kato, M., Ichimura, M., Arai, E. and Tokuda, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, L1094 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Hacke, P., Okushi, H., Kuroda, T., Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., and Sawaki, N., J. Crystal Growth 189, 541 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Tokuda, Y., Shimizu, N. and Usami, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys, 18, No. 2, L309 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Zekentes, K., Kamiyama, M., and Constantinidis, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3015 (1995)Google Scholar
8. Zhou, P., Spencer, M. G., Harris, G. L. and Fekade, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1384 (1987)Google Scholar
9. Chantre, A., Vincent, G. and Bois, D., Phys. Rev. B 23, 5335 (1981)Google Scholar