Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:59:30.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of CMP Pad Surface Texture and Pad-Wafer Contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Gregory P. Muldowney  and
David B. James
Gregory P. Muldowney
Affiliation:
Advanced Research and Pad Technology Groups Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials, CMP Technologies, Newark, DE, USA
David B. James
Affiliation:
Advanced Research and Pad Technology Groups Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials, CMP Technologies, Newark, DE, USA
Get access

Abstract

Surface texture of CMP polishing pads varies considerably with the intrinsic microstructure of the pad, the addition of perforations or grooves, and the means of surface conditioning. The state of pad-wafer contact is determined by both large and small-scale texture in the top pad asperity layer and by the interaction of the top pad and sub-pad.

A flow-based texture characterization test was applied to several types of CMP polishing pads to describe the asperity layer as a porous media having a void fraction and characteristic length. Fluid pressure loss profiles were measured in a radial flow geometry across pad samples pressed against a flat instrumented plate. Symmetry of the profiles revealed the extent of contact between the pad and the plate, and curvature of the profiles showed the relative contributions of viscous and inertial flow among the asperities. Sub-pads, grooving, and conditioning all increased padwafer contact and the effective resistance of the surface texture, improving flow uniformity. Soft pads showed higher inertial flow influence than fixed abrasives with regularly spaced asperities. The results demonstrate that pad surface texture has a strong influence on heat and mass transfer at the wafer surface in CMP. Implications are discussed for both pad design and CMP modeling.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 816: Symposium K – Advances in Chemical-Mechanical Polishing , 2004 , K5.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cook, L. M., “Semiconductors and Semimetals”, Vol. 63, Chapter 6, Academic Press (2000).Google Scholar
2. Baker, R. and Lane, S., CMP Technology for ULSI Interconnection, SEMI (1998).Google Scholar
3. Baker, R., Proceedings of CMP-MIC Conference (1997).Google Scholar
4. Stein, D., Hetherington, D., Dugger, M. and Stout, T., J. Elect. Mat., 25, 1623 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Oliver, M. R., Schmidt, R. E. and Robinson, M., Proceedings of ECS Meeting (2000).Google Scholar
6. Lawing, A. S., Semicon China 2004, SEMI Technology Symposium (2004).Google Scholar
7. Lawing, A. S., Proceedings of MRS Meeting, Vol. 732E (2002).Google Scholar
8. Oliver, M. R. (ed.), “Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Semiconductor Materials”, Springer Series in Material Science, Springer (2004).Google Scholar
9. Fury, M. and James, D., SPIE Microelectronic Manufacturing Symposium (1996).Google Scholar
10. Cook, L., Roberts, J., Jenkins, C. and Pillai, R., US Patent 5,489,233 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Huey, S., Mear, S., Wang, Y., Jin, R., Ceresi, J., Freeman, P., Johnson, D., Vo, T. and Eppert, S., IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (1999).Google Scholar
12. Dyer, T. and Schlueter, J., Micro, 20 (1), 47–54, (2002).Google Scholar
13. Muldowney, G. P., Proceedings of AIChE Meeting (2003).Google Scholar
14. Ergun, S., Chem. Engr. Prog., 48, 89 (1952).Google Scholar
15. Muldowney, G. P., US Patent application (2003).Google Scholar
16. Muldowney, G. P. and Tselepidakis, D. P., Proceedings of CMP-MIC Conference (2004).Google Scholar
17. Higdon, J. J. L., J. Fluid Mech., 159, 195 (1985).Google Scholar
18. Sundararajan, S., Thakurta, D. G., Schwendeman, D. W., Murarka, S. P., and Gill, W. N., J. Electrochem. Soc., 146 (2) 761 (1999).Google Scholar
19. Thakurta, D. G., Borst, C. L., Schwendeman, D. W., Gutmann, R. J., and Gill, W. N., J. Electrochem. Soc., 148 (4) G207 (2001).Google Scholar
20. Patir, N. and Cheng, H. S., Trans. ASME, 100, 12 (1978).Google Scholar
21. Patir, N. and Cheng, H. S., Trans. ASME, 101, 220 (1979).Google Scholar
22. Muldowney, G. P., Proceedings of MRS Spring Meeting (2004).Google Scholar