Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:44:51.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Alumina and Silica Sol-Gel Encapsulated Fe/Co/Ru Nanocatalysts in Microchannel Reactors for F-T Synthesis of Higher Alkanes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

D. Kuila
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272 Chemistry Program, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272 [email protected], Phone: 318-257-5121; Fax: 318-257-5104
V.S. Nagineni
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272 Chemistry Program, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
S. Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
H. Indukuri
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
Y. Liang
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
A. Potluri
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
U. Siriwardane
Affiliation:
Chemistry Program, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
N. Seetala
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA 71245
J. Fang
Affiliation:
Institute for Micro manufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272
Get access

Abstract

We have been investigating conversion of syngas (CO: H2) to higher alkanes [Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) Process] in 5 μm and 25 μm channel microreactors coated with sol-gel encapsulated Fe/Co-nanocatalysts. These nano-metal-catalysts were incorporated into the sol-gel matrix by two methods: 1) metal nitrate solutions; 2) metal oxide nanoparticles. Characterization of these catalysts containing Co and Fe in alumina and silica sol-gel has been carried out by several techniques. The surface area measurements by BET method show an average specific surface area of 285 m2/g for alumina and 300 m2/g for silica sol-gel encapsulated catalysts. In order to optimize the sol-gel preparation and deposition in the microchannels, the elemental composition of sol-gel encapsulated catalyst was examined by EDX. The SEM and AFM images of the reactors before and after deposition of the catalysts have also been studied. Hydrogenation-reduction efficiency of the activated Fe-Co catalysts and the level of poisoning after the reaction were estimated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The result suggests more efficient reduction in the case of the nano-particle metal oxides compared to that derived from metal nitrate solutions. In overall, 85% of the catalyst is poisoned after 25 hrs of catalytic reaction. The surface area and the syngas conversion results indicate that silica sol-gel matrix may be a better catalyst support. For alumina sol-gel support, higher conversion of syn-gas is observed with 25 μm microreactor channels. For silica sol-gel, syngas conversion as high as 73% has been achieved by adding Ru as a promoter to the Fe/Co catalyst mixture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. C& EN, 18-19, July 21, 2003.Google Scholar
2. Schanke, D., Hilmen, A.M., Bergene, E., Kinnari, K., Rytter, E., Adnanes, E., Holmen, A..; Energy Fuel 10, 867 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Sun, S., Tsubaki, N. and Fujimoto, K..; Applied Catalysis A: General 202, 121131 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Iglesia, E.; Applied Catalysis A: General 161, 59 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Niemela, M.K., Krause, A., Vaara, T., Kiviaho, J., Reinikainen, M..; Applied Catalysis A: General 147, 325 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Srinivasan, R. et al. ,; AIChE Journal 43(11), 30593068 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Ehrfeld, W, Hessel, V, Lowe, H; Microreactors: New Technology for Modern Chemistry, WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, ISBN3-527-29590-9, (2000).Google Scholar
8. Zhang, L., Xue, D..; Journal of Material Science Letters 21, 19311933 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Madou, M; Fundamentals of Microfabrication: The Science of Miniaturization, Second Edition CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9451-1, (1997).Google Scholar
10. Nagineni, V. S. et al. ; Submitted to Chem. Mater.Google Scholar
11. Zhao, S, PhD Dissertation, Louisiana Tech University, 2003.Google Scholar
12. Haas-Santo, K., Fichtner, M., Schubert, K., Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
13. Wang, Z and Lin, Y. S..; Journal of Catalysis 174, 4351 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Naidu, S.V., Siriwardane, U., Murty, A.N., Vegesna, N.S., Nwizugbu, J., Leonard, J., and Jones, C.R..; Microsc. Microanal. 9, 408, (2003).Google Scholar