Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:24:06.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of Polycrystalline Copper Films Made by CVD from Cu(HFA)2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Do-Heyoung Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180.
Robert H. Wentorf
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180.
William N. Gill
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180.
Get access

Abstract

Thin Copper films have been deposited on various substrates by the reduction of copper bis-hexafluoroacetylacetonate, Cu(HFA)2, with hydrogen to investigate the characteristics of the films made at 2–10 torr of total pressure, substrate temperatures of 280–400 °C and precursor temperatures of 55–90 °C. Under the conditions investigated, the highest growth rate was 650 Å/min. and the resistivity of the films was routinely near 2.0 μΩ-cm at 5000 Å or more thickness. Film growth rate depended on precursor concentration and substrate temperature. RBS and AES analysis indicate that the copper deposited at 310–400°C is highly pure. SEM photographs revealed that different structures form depending on substrate kind, the deposition conditions and the deposition time. The surface roughness of the films increased with increasing thickness. The reflectivity of the copper films depends on their thickness and decreases as the grain size increases. The grain sizes in the films were about 0.1–2.0 μm and are correlated with film thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shingubara, S., Nakasaki, Y., and Kaneko, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 42 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Baum, T. H., Larson, C. E., Chem. of Mater., 4, 365, (1992)Google Scholar
3. Reynolds, S. K., Smart, C. J., Baran, E. F., Baum, T. H., Larson, C. E., and Brock, P. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59, 2332, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jain, A., Chi, K-M, Kodas, T. T., Hampden-Smith, M. J., Fair, J. D., and Paffett, M. F., Chem. of Mater. 2, 995, (1991).Google Scholar
5. Beach, D. B., LeGoues, F. K., and Hu, C-K, Chem. of Mater., 2, 216, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Norman, J. A. T., Muratore, B. A., Dyer, P. N., Roberts, D. A., and Hochberg, A. K., IEEE VMIC conf. (Santa Clara, CA, 1991), P. 123.Google Scholar
7. Vanhemert, R. L., Spendlove, L. B., and Sievers, R. E., J. Electrochem. Soc, 112, 1123, (1963).Google Scholar
8. Awaya, N. and Arita, Y., Proc. 1991 Symp. on VLSI Tech. (Oiso, Japan, 1991), P.37.Google Scholar
9. Lai, W. G., Xie, Y., and Griffin, G. L., J. Electrochem. Soc, 138, 3499, (1991).Google Scholar
10. Kaloyeros, A. E., Feng, A., Garhart, J., Brooks, K. C., Ghosh, S. K., Saxena, A. N., and Luehrs, F., J. Electron. Mater., 19, 271, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar