Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:11:34.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterisation of Thin Lattice Mismatched Heteroepitaxial Layers by XRD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Mary A. G. Halliwell*
Affiliation:
BT Laboratories, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 7RE, UK
Get access

Abstract

Many advanced III - V devices require highly strained heteroepitaxial layers less than 25 nm in thickness, with tight specifications on both the layer thickness and composition. In many cases the layers required are close to the critical thickness.

The growth conditions for these thin layers are often extrapolated from established conditions for thicker layers. This method can result in layers which have the incorrect thickness and composition because of the transients which occur as growth commences. To minimise this problem it is desirable to establish growth conditions for layers which are as close to device requirements as possible. X-ray diffraction is capable of measuring layer thicknesses and compositions non-destructively. The minimum measurable layer thickness is usually within a small factor (typically 0.5 to 5 times) of device requirements.

A single x-ray rocking curve is required to determine the thickness and composition of an unrelaxed (strained) layer. At least two rocking curves are required when relaxation is present. This paper discusses the appropriate choice of measurement conditions for a given sample.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Halliwell, M. A. G., Lyons, M. H. and Hill, M. J., J. Crystal Growth 68 523 (1984)Google Scholar
2. Fewster, P. F. and Curling, C. J., J. Appl. Phys. 62 4154 (1987)Google Scholar
3. Matthews, J. W., Blakeslee, A. E. and Mader, S., Thin Solid Films 33 253 (1976)Google Scholar
4. Macrander, A. T., Lau, S., Strege, K. and Chu, S. N. G., Appl. Phys. Letts 52, 1985 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Halliwell, M. A. G., Advances in X-ray Analysis 33 61 (Plenum Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar