Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-l72pf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T10:26:52.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Channeling of Shallow Si Implants Into GaAs as a Function of Tilt and Rotation Angles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Harold J. Hovel ,
T. E. McKoy ,
J. M. Mitcheli ,
G. Scilla ,
S. J. Moorea  and
F. Cardone
Harold J. Hovel
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
T. E. McKoy
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
J. M. Mitcheli
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
G. Scilla
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
F. Cardone
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Get access

Abstract

The effects of tilt and rotation angle on implant channeling are explored for Si implants into (100)-oriented GaAs substrates using Monte Carlo simulations, SIMS profiling, capacitance profiling, and Hall measurements. It is shown that the 7° tilt angle often used to prevent axial channeling is not large enough, and 11–13° angles are required to obtain the sharpest and most reproducible implant profiles. Rotation angles have a much smaller effect on the profiles as long as the beam incidence is kept away from the < 110 > direction.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 144: Symposium W – Advances in Materials, Processing and Devices in III-V Compound Semiconductors , 1988 , 439
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Current, M., Turner, N., Smith, T.C., and Crane, D., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. Physics Res. B 6, 336 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ziegler, J. and Lever, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 358 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Kasahara, J., Sakurai, H., Suzuki, T., Arai, M., and Watanabe, N., Proc. 1985 IEEE GaAs IC Symposium, pg. 37.Google Scholar
4. Blunt, R. and Davies, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 1015 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Rosenblatt, D.H., Hitchens, W.R., Anholt, R.E., and Sigmon, T.W., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. EDL 9, 139, (1988).Google Scholar
6. Mayer, J. W., Eriksson, L., and Davies, J.A., Ion Implantation In Semiconductors, Academic Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
7. Current, M.I., Turner, N.L., Smith, T.C., and Crane, D., 5th Intl. Conf. on Ion Impl. Equip. and Tech., Smugglers Notch, July 1984.Google Scholar
8. Garofalo, F. and Mazzone, A.M., Phys. Stat. Sol. 98, 517 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Brannon, K.W. and lever, R.F., Extended Abstracts, San Diego Meeting, llectrochem. Soc., Oct. 1986.Google Scholar
10. Robinson, M.T., Phys. Rev. B 27, 5347 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Lindhard, J., Scharff, M., and Schiott, H., Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Sclsk. 33, 1 (1963).Google Scholar