Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:33:40.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Channeling and its Potential Consequences for Radionuclides Transport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Luis Moreno
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, September, 1987
Ivars Neretnieks
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, September, 1987
Get access

Summary

Radionuclide transport through fractured media is usually calculated assuming that water flows in most of the fractures. Several observations in the field and the laboratory show that flow is very unevenly distributed in fractured crystalline rock. These observations indicate that most of the water flow takes place in a limited number of channels. The channels are seldom wider than a few meters and are often much narrower. This means that the surface of the fracture in contact with the flowing water (wetted surface) is less than one might expect.

This low value of the wet surface of the fracture may considerably influence the transport of radionuclides through fractured media. If the channels do not intersect over a certain distance, then the channels may be modelled as a bundle of independent channels. Channels with a large flow and small sorption surface will carry the tracer rapidly and in large amounts.

Calculations are performed for cases where channeling is assumed to take place. The most important entities to assess are the water flow distribution in the different channels, the wetted surface of the channels, the diffusivity into the rock matrix, and the sorption coefficient in the matrix. Experimental data for the water flow distribution are used and the transport of nuclides is calculated for the different channels. From these values the concentration of the effluent is determined. The results show that the retardation for the nonsorbing nuclides is negligible. Retardation is only important for the nuclides which are strongly sorbed on the granitic rock. Calculations are also done assuming other channel frequencies and other overall water flowrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1 Pyrak, L.R., Myer, L.R. and Cook, N.G., Determination of fracture void geometry and contact at different effective stress, EOS transactions, AGU (abstract), 66, 903, 1985 Google Scholar
2 Neretnieks, I., Eriksen, T., Tähtinen, P. Tracer Movement in a Single Fissure in Granitic Rock: Some Experimental Results and their Interpretation. Water Resources Res. 18, 1982, p 849858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Neretnieks, I., Abelin, H., and Birgersson, L., Some recent observations of channeling in fractured rocks. Its potential impact on radionuclide migration., In DOE/AECL conference sept 15–17, 1987, San Francisco, proceeding to be publishedGoogle Scholar
4 Viak, (Bolvede, P., Christiansson, R.) SKB Forsmarksarbetena SFR. Vattenfarande Sprickor inom LageromrAdet. Stockholm Jan 1987. (Water bearing fractures in the repository area) (In Swedish)Google Scholar
5 Palmqvist, K. Kymmens kraftverk. Fullortborrad tunnel. Hydrogeologisk kartering och utvärdering. Report in preparation Bergab AB company. Göteborh, 1987. (In Swedish)Google Scholar
6 Tsang, Y.W., Tsang, C.F., Neretnieks, I. Some Properties of a Channeling Model of Fracture Flow. Report SKB TR-series in preparation Jan 1987.Google Scholar
7 Moreno, L., Tsang, Y.W., Tsang, C.F., and Neretnieks, I., Flow and solute transport in a single fracture. A two-dimensional statistical model, Manuscript to publication as SKB Technical Report (1987).Google Scholar
8 Neretnieks, I. Diffusion in the Rock Matrix: An Important Factor in Radionuclide Retardation? J. Geophys. Res. 85, 1980, p 43794397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar