Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:44:08.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change of C–C Bond Length in Layers of Graphite Upon Charge Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Miklos Kertesz ,
Ferenc Vonderviszt  and
Roald Hoffman
Miklos Kertesz
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute for Chemistry, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Ferenc Vonderviszt
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute for Chemistry, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Roald Hoffman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Materials Science Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
Get access

Abstract

Tight binding crystal orbital calculations on infinite layers of graphite have been performed for charge transfer (q) values ranging from −0.15 to +0.15 e/carbon atom. The rC-C carbon-carbon bond lengths have been optimized at several q values. The change of the calculated rC-C values as a function of q fits very well with the experimentally observed variations of the C-C bond lengths of both acceptor and donor compounds of intercalated graphite. The asymmetry of the variation of rC-c with respect to the sign of the charge transfer is related to the slightly antibonding nature (at the level of second neighbor interactions) of the π-electrons around the Fermi level of pristine graphite, similar to those in polyacetylene.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 20: Symposium H – Intercalated Graphite , 1982 , 141
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nixon, D. E. and Parry, G. S., J. Phys. C 2, 1732 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Guérard, D., Zeller, C. and Hérold, A., C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 283, Ser. C 437 (1976).Google Scholar
3. Pietronero, L. and Strässler, , Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 593 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Holzwarth, N. A. W., this Symposium.Google Scholar
5. Kertész, M., Vonderviszt, F. and Pekker, S., Chem. Phys. Lett. 90, 430 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Whangbo, M.-H., Hoffmann, R. and Woodward, R. B., Proc. Roy. Soc. A366, 23 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Flandrois, S., Masson, J. M., Rouillon, J. C., Gaultier, J. and Haw, C., Solid State Commun. (in press).Google Scholar
8. Hérold, A., private communication to authors of reference 3.Google Scholar
9. Markiewicz, R. S., Kasper, J. C. and Interrante, L. V., private communication to authors of reference 3.Google Scholar
10. Krapchev, T., Ogilvie, R. and Dresselhaus, M. S., Carbon 20, 132 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Ghosh, D. and Chung, D. D. L., unpublished.Google Scholar