Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:05:30.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cellular Response to Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Sonya Shortkroff ,
Mary Beth Turell ,
Karen Rice  and
Thomas S. Thornhill
Sonya Shortkroff
Affiliation:
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A.
Mary Beth Turell
Affiliation:
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A.
Karen Rice
Affiliation:
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A.
Thomas S. Thornhill
Affiliation:
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Particles of BaSO4 with sizes in nano-scale and micro-scale ranges were investigated for their interactions with fibroblasts in order to determine the biocompatibility of nano-sized particles. Cells were incubated in the presence of particles at 1, 10 and 100 times the particle to cell surface area ratio and at a single concentration of 0.138 mg/ml. Production by the fibroblasts of an inflammatory cytokine in response to the particles was measured and the effect of particle size and volume on cell viability was examined. All particles were cell associated and some agglomeration was visible at all size ranges. Release of interleukin-6 by cells subjected to the same concentration of Ba SO4was similar to control levels, while addition of 1x surface area ratio (SAR) of particles to cells resulted in an increase in IL-6 from 94 pg/ml for 100 nm particles to 218 pg/ml with 2 μm particle diameter. By increasing particle to cell surface area ratios from 1× to 100x, cell viability was compromised for the 2μm particles but was not affected by the nanometer sized BaSO4 particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 704: Symposium W – Nanoparticulate Materials , 2001 , W11.5.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rae, T., J Biomed Mater Res, 1977. 11: p. 839–846.Google Scholar
2. Lazarus, M.D., Cuckler, J.M., Schumacher, H.R. Jr, Ducheyne, P., and Baker, D.G., J Orthop Res, 1994. 12 (4): p. 532–541.Google Scholar
3. Sabokbar, A., Fujikawa, Y., Murray, D.W., and Athanasou, N.A., J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1997. 79 (1): p. 129–134.Google Scholar
4. Abildgaard, N., Glerup, H., Rungby, J., Bendix-Hansen, K., Kassem, M., Brixen, K., Heickendorff, L., Nielsen, J.L., and Eriksen, E.F., Eur J Haematol, 2000. 64 (2): p. 121–129.Google Scholar
5. Glant, T.T., Jacobs, J.J., Molnar, G., Shanbhag, A.S., Valyon, M., and Galante, J.O.: Bone resorption activity of particulate-stimulated macrophages. J Bone Miner Res, 1993. 8 (9): p. 1071–1079.Google Scholar
6. Kohilas, K., Lyons, M., Lofthouse, R., Frondoza, C.G., Jinnah, R., and Hungerford, D.S., J Biomed Mater Res, 1999. 47 (1): p. 95–103.Google Scholar
7. Granchi, D., Verri, E., Ciapetti, G., Stea, S., Savarino, L., Sudanese, A., Mieti, M., Rotini, R., Dallari, D., Zinghi, G., J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998. 80 (5): p. 912–917.Google Scholar
8. Horowitz, S.M. and Gonzales, J.B., Calcif Tissue Int, 1996. 59 (5): p. 392–396.Google Scholar
9. Zambonin, G., Colucci, S., Cantatore, F., and Grano, M., Calcif Tissue Int, 1998. 62 (4): p. 362–365.Google Scholar