Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:02:31.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cellular Response to Heterogeneously Charged Polystyrene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ravi Kapur ,
Grace Lee Picciolo  and
Jonathan Black
Ravi Kapur
Affiliation:
Dr. Ravi Kapur's present affiliation is with the Center For Biomolecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 20375
Grace Lee Picciolo
Affiliation:
Division Of Mechanics And Materials Science, Food And Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20852.
Jonathan Black
Affiliation:
Department Of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Get access

Abstract

Cells are sensitive to topological, chemical and electrical properties of substrates on which they are grown. However, most studies of cell-surface interactions have neglected electrical effects or confounded them with other substrate properties. The use of nanofabrication technology has made it possible to fabricate optically transparent surfaces, with controlled chemistry and topology, with active, controllable surface charge density in domains as small as 1–4 um1. Human monocytes incubated on polystyrene with 3.3 um wide strip domains alternately charged, so as to maintain overall charge neutrality, show significant charge density and time dependent increases (greater than twofold) in cell area and cell perimeter after challenge with a phagocytic trigger (human IgG opsonized Zymosan particles). Additional ultrastructural studies on silicon dioxide substrates show charge density dependent qualitative morphological differences. The human monocytes exhibited significant charge density and time dependent hyper-phagocytosis (> 25fold increase over control) of human IgG opsonized Zymosan particles. The charge-induced surfaces modulated the amplitude of the secreted extracellular levels of cytokines and also induced a temporal shift in the kinetics of cytokine release2.

These studies demonstrate that human blood peripheral monocytes respond in-vitro to the peak magnitude of local surface charge heterogeneity in the absence of substrate topology and compositional variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 414: Symposium Z – Thin Films and Surfaces for Bioactivity and Biomedical Applications , 1995 , 133
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kapur, R., Lilien, J., Picciolo, G., and Black, J., “Human monocyte morphology is affected by substrate charge heterogeneity,” in press Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research (1996).Google Scholar
2. Kapur, R., DeCoster, M., Picciolo, G., and Black, J., “Hyperphagocytosis by human monocytes in the presence of local charge heterogeneity,” submitted to Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research (1996).Google Scholar
3. Maroudas, N.G., “Adhesion and spreading of cells on charged surfaces,”; J. Theor. Biol., 49, 417–424 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Aebischer, P., Valentini, R.F., Dario, P., Domenici, C., and Galletti, M.P., “Piezoelectric guidance channels enhance regeneration in the mouse sciatic nerve after axotomy, Brain Research, 436, 165–168 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Valentini, R., Vargo, T.G., Gardella, J.A., and Aebischer, P., “Electrically charged polymeric substrates enhance nerve fibre outgrowth in vitro,”; Biomaterials, 13(3), (1992).Google Scholar
6. Kapur, R., Lilien, J., and Black, J., “Field-dependent fibroblast orientation on charged surfaces is independent of polarity and adsorbed serum proteins,”; Biomnaterials, 14, 854–860 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Marchant., R., and Wang, I., “Physical and Chemical Aspects of Biomaterials used in Humans,”; in Implantation Biology, ed. Greco, R., CRC Press, 13–38 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Pollack, A., and Gordon, S., “Scanning Electron Microscopy of Murine Macrophages: Surface Characteristics during Maturation, Activation and Phagocytosis,”; Laboratory Investigation, 23(5), 469–474 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Karnovsky, M.L., Lazdins, J., Drath, D., Soberman, R., and Baduery, J., “Biochemical characteristics of macrophages in different functional states,”; in Phagocytosis-past and future, (ed) Karnovsky, and Boles, , Academic Press NY., 419–428 (1982).Google Scholar