Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:28:46.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cell Interactions With Fibronectin-Coated Electrically Conducting Polypyrrole Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Joyce Y. Wong
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Robert Langer
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Donald E. Ingber
Affiliation:
Depts. of Surgery and Pathology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

Surface properties of electrically conducting polymers, including charge-density and wettability, can be altered reversibly by oxidation or reduction. Thus, these materials are interesting systems on which to study the interactions of proteins and cells with surfaces. The properties of polypyrrole were studied in environments suitable for protein adsorption and cell culture. Optically transparent films of polypyrrole were synthesized, and the stability of the oxidized and reduced states in aqueous media were studied. UV/VIS spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and spectroelectrochemistry measurements confirmed the oxidation state of the polymer films. The positively-charged form of polypyrrole could be changed to its neutral form by applying a constant potential (-0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference). It was found that the shape of bovine aortic endothelial cells on fibronectin-coated polypyrrole films can be controlled by varying the oxidation state of the polypyrrole.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Valentini, R.F., Sabatini, A.M., Dario, P. and Aebischer, P., Brain Research 480 300304 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Baier, R.E., Shafrin, E.G. and Zisman, W.A., Science 162 13601368 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Grinnell, F., Int. Rev. Cytol. 53 65144 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Ingber, D.E., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 87 35793583 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Mooney, D., Hansen, L., Vacanti, J., Langer, R., Farmer, S. and Ingber, D., J. Cell. Physiol. 151 497505 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Kanatzidis, M.G., Chemical and Engineering News 68 (49), 3654 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Diaz, A.F. and Bargon, J., in Electrochemical synthesis of conducting polymers, edited by Skotheim, T.A. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1986) pp. 81.Google Scholar
8. Iseki, M., Saito, K., Kuhara, K. and Mizukami, A., Synthetic Metals 40 117126 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Street, G.B., in Polypyrrole: From powders to plastics, edited by Skotheim, T.A. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1986) pp. 265.Google Scholar
10. Umana, M. and Waller, J., Analytical Chemistry 58 29792983 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Miller, L.L., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 160 297 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Wallace, G.G. and Lin, Y.P., Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 247 145156 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Smith, A.B. and Knowles, C.J., Journal of Applied Polymer Science 43 399403 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Prezyna, L.A., Qiu, Y.-J., Reynolds, J.R. and Wnek, G.E., Macromolecules 24 52835287 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Minehan, D.S., Marx, K.A. and Tripathy, S.K., Polym. Mat. Sci. Eng. 64 341–2 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Gabridge, M.G., In Vitro 17 (2), 9197 (1981).Google Scholar
17. Li, Y. and Qian, R., Synthetic Metals 28 C127C132 (1989).Google Scholar
18. Diaz, A.F. and Kanazawa, K.K., in Polypyrrole: An electrochemical approach to conducting polymers, edited by Miller, J.S. (Plenum Press, New York, 1983) pp. 417441.Google Scholar
19. Genies, E.M. and Pernaut, J.-M., J. Electroanal. Chem. 191 111126 (1985).Google Scholar