Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:33:35.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can a National Network of Undergraduate Research Program Directors Validate a Set of Professional Skills-Building Science Communication Workshops?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2015

Carol Lynn Alpert
Affiliation:
Museum of Science, One Science Park, Boston, MA 02114-1099, U.S.A.
Karine Thate
Affiliation:
Museum of Science, One Science Park, Boston, MA 02114-1099, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports on the progress of an ongoing strategy for dissemination of a set of science communication workshops targeted to students participating in undergraduate research experiences on university campuses. Previous MRS Proceedings papers by the first author and collaborators focused on (1) the development and validation of the REU Science Communication Workshop (REU SCW) model through iterative practice, research and evaluation between 2005 and 2009, and (2) the 2012 testing of a scaffolded and piggybacked "beyond train-the-trainer” mode of dissemination of the REU SCW model to multiple university campuses, as compared to a highly-validated but less efficient one-to-one transfer process deployed between Boston and Madison between 2010 and 2012. This new paper reports on the follow-up effort to confirm and validate the success of the REU SCW workshop model as implemented at the second-wave of dissemination sites by the new cohort of participating undergraduate research program directors. We analyze data gathered in 2013 and 2014 from the participating students, faculty, and providers. The results indicate that the second-wave providers were able to reproduce the successful results achieved at the origination and first dissemination sites, and that providers and stakeholders at these additional sites value the model enough to continue providing it and in some cases to laterally expand it to other programs on campus. These findings suggest that it is possible to greatly expand the number of undergraduate research experience students receiving quality coaching in professional science communication skills by providing their program directors with a comprehensive professional development experience, employing the scaffolded, piggybacked, “beyond train-the-trainer” professional development model.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

The NSF Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing at Northeastern, UMass-Lowell, and UNH, and the NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center at Harvard, MIT, UCSB, and MOS.Google Scholar
Alpert, C.L., Levine, E., Barry, C., Isaacs, J., Fiorentino, A., Hollar, K., Thate, K., “Tackling Science Communication with REU Students: A Formative Evaluation of a Collaborative Approach,” Materials Education, ed. by M. Marinho Patterson, D. Dunham, E. Marshall, J. Nucci (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1234, 2009), pp.04–12.Google Scholar
Alpert, C.L., “Beyond ‘Train-the-Trainer:’ A Preliminary Report on a New Scaffolding Strategy for Science Communication Workshop Dissem.,” MRS Online Proc. Library 1532 (2013).Google Scholar
Alpert, C.L., “REU Science Communication Workshop Planning & Implementation Guide,” NISE Network, 2011, revised 2014. http://www.nisenet.org/catalog/tools_guides/reu_science_communication_workshop Google Scholar
March 2014 responses to email survey sent to all REU SCW providers.Google Scholar
November 2014 responses to email survey sent to all REU SCW providers.Google Scholar