Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:28:43.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

By-Product Sulfur from the Stabilization of Coal Solid Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. J. Gokhalea
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Zachary Hall, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.
G. Burnet
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory, U.S.D.O.E. and Department of Chemical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Get access

Abstract

A stabilization process for coal cleaning and coal combustion-related wastes has been developed that uses the energy derived from the fuel contained in the coal cleaning wastes. The wastes are pulverized, when necessary, formed into granules in a rotary pan agglomerator, and then fired to a sintering temperature. The result is a readily disposable product that is highly resistant to environmental degradation. Granules of refuse only, and of refuse/fly ash and refuse/FGD sludge mixtures have been investigated. About 90 wt% of the sulfur in the refuse/sludge mixtures is evolved as SO2 during the combustion/sintering portion of the process. Studies using a microreactor system have shown the generation of SO2 to be a function of temperature and to parallel the decomposition of the sulfur-containing compounds present. Based on laboratory tests, SO2 concentrations of 4–8 vol% are predicted in the SO2-rich off-gases. By-product sulfur recovery from the off-gases appears practical and attractive using current technology that is proven and well established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Amer. Coal Ash Assoc., Ash Prod. and Ash Util.-1985 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Gutschick, K.A., STP 931, ASTM, 52 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Burnet, G., and Gokhale, A.J., in Processing and Utilization of High Sulfur Coals II, edited by Chugh, Y.P. and Caudle, R.D. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1987), pp. 431–443.Google Scholar
4. Ann. Book of ASTM Stds., D3987-81, ASTM (1977).Google Scholar
5. Fed. Reg., 43, No. 243, 58956-57, (1978).Google Scholar
6. Dolar-Mantuani, L., Handbook of Concrete Aggregates, (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1983), pp. 216218.Google Scholar
7. Fed. Reg., 45, No. 98, 33122, (1980).Google Scholar
8. Hockett, P., (private communication).Google Scholar
9. Burnet, G. and Gokhale, A.J., presented at the Ia. Acad. Sci. Annual Meeting, Iowa State University, 1988 (unpublished).Google Scholar
10. Sander, U.H.F., Fischer, H., Rothe, U. and Kola, R., Sulphur. Sulphur Dioxide and Sulphuric Add, (British Sulphur Corp., Ltd., London, 1984), pp. 177179.Google Scholar
11. Schobert, H.H., Coal-The Energy Source of the Past and the Future (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1987), pp. 124126.Google Scholar
12. Ford, P.G., Modern Power Sys. 7, 37 (1987).Google Scholar