Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:27:27.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broadening Middle-School Students' Images of Science and Scientists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Diandra L. Leslie-Pelecky
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy and Center for Materials Research & Analysis, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588–0111, U.S.A.
Gayle A. Buck
Affiliation:
2Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588–0355, U.S.A.
Angela Zabawa
Affiliation:
Lincoln Public Schools, Lincoln NE 68510, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The ‘mad scientist’ stereotype is alive and well – and not an image most K-12 students can (or want to) embrace. Project Fulcrum, a National Science Foundation-funded GK-12 program, partners math, science and engineering graduate students with elementary and middle-level teachers. One project goal – broadening student images of science and scientists –is addressed by projects developed by the teacher/scientist teams that are focused on the specific needs of their students. The projects developed focus on scientists, the use of science in different types of jobs, and developing scientific skills. Pre-project research, in which teachers probe the motivation behind their students’ attitudes, is a critical component of developing a successful project. Although determining the specific impact of this project on student attitudes is complicated by its being part of a larger project, teachers and scientists report enhanced awareness of student attitudes and the reasons underlying those attitudes, and generated ideas to address those motivations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. gMead, M. and Metraux, R., Science 126 (1957) 384390.Google Scholar
2. Chambers, D., Sci. Ed. 67 (1983) 255265.Google Scholar
3. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators. (National Science Foundation, 2002).Google Scholar
4. Kahle, J. B. and Meece, J., “Research on Gender Issues in the Classroom”, Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, ed. Gabel, D., (Macmillan, 1994) pp 542557.Google Scholar
5. Packard, B. W.-L., Wong, E. D., paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, April 19–23, 1999).Google Scholar
6. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., Chambers, S., J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36 (1999) 719.Google Scholar
7. Bruce, B. C., Bruce, S. P., Conrad, R. L., Huang, H. J., J. Res. Sci. Teach 34 (1997) 69.Google Scholar
8. Snelling, W. R., Boruch, R. F., Science in Liberal Arts Colleges. A Longitudinal Study of 49 Selective Colleges (Columbia University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
9. Hall, E. R., Post-Kammer, P., Career Development Quarterly 35 (1987) 206.Google Scholar
10. National Research Council, National Science Education Standards, (National Academy Press, 1996).Google Scholar
11. Lane, N., American Scientist 84 (1996) 208.Google Scholar
12. Alberts, B. M., “A 10-Step Recipe for Starting a Partnership Program”, Science Education Partnerships: Manual for Scientists and K-12 Teachers, ed. Sussman, A. (University of California at San Francisco, 1993) pp 1518.Google Scholar
13. Buck, G. A., Leslie-Pelecky, D. L., Kirby, S. R., J. Elem. Sci. Ed. 14 (2003) 1.Google Scholar
14. Bruce, S. P., Bruce, B. C., Comput. Hum. Behav. 16 (2000) 241.Google Scholar
15. Krajkovich, J., Smith, J., J. Res. Sci. Teach. 19 (1982) 39.Google Scholar