Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:33:42.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A breakup model of Jetting formation of Explosively Loaded Granular Shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2013

Kun Xue*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China. Nottingham Centre for Geomechanics, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates the underlying physics governing the explosion driven expansion and fragmentation of spherical beds packed of partially saturated sand with varying mass fractions of interstitial oil. The breakup onset of the sand shells is characterized by the formation of fragments/agglomerates consisting of a large number of constituent grains, which in later time present themselves as prolific and regular jetting streams. Test data show a postponed jetting formation when sand shells are subject to the explosion with a higher detonation velocity, meanwhile a reduced jet mass scale is observed. A kinetic energy driven breakup model is proposed based on the instability criterion involving the opposing forces of stabilizing inertial pressures and destabilizing viscous resistance. This analytical model is capable of predicting the onset of granular material fragmentation as well as the characteristic fragment size, which is consistent with the experimental results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Parrish, C., Worland, I., and Kontis, K.: ‘Dynamic Jet Formation from Mitigation Materials 28th International Symposium on Shock Waves’ (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 107–113 10.1007/978-3-642-25685-1_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoire, Y., David, F., and Oren, P., AIP Conf. Proc. 1426, (1), 16231626 (2011)Google Scholar
Fan, Z., AIP Conf. Proc. 1426, (1), 2734 (2011)Google Scholar
Milne, A., Parrish, C., and Worland, I., Shock Waves 20, (1), 4151 (2010)10.1007/s00193-009-0235-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, L.F., Fan, Z., Susan, M., Stephen, B.M., Andrew, J.H., Marta, S., Marc, C.-C., and Chayawat, O., AIP Conf. Proc. 620, (1), 946949 (2002)Google Scholar
Mercier, S., and Molinari, A., Int. J. Impact Eng 30, (4), 403419 (2004)10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00063-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, J.P., Grady, D., and Cogar, J.R., Int. J. Impact Eng 26, (1鈥?0), 6576 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, L.A., J. App. Phys. 65, (8), 30063016 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, Tracy J., Alexander, C.Scott, Thornhill, Tom F., and Reinhart, W.D.: ‘Pressure-shear experiments on granular materials’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Pressure-shear experiments on granular materials’ (Sandia National Laboratories, 2011, edn.), pp.Google Scholar
Song, B., Chen, W., and Luk, V., Mech. Mater. 41, (6), 777785 (2009)10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, A.R., J. App. Phys. 69, (11), 74747486 (1991)Google Scholar