Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:49:22.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boron and Hydrogen in NI3AL: Part II. Mechanical Testing of Bicrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Patricia E. Johnson ,
W. Gourdin ,
A. Gonis ,
N. Kioussis  and
M. Vaudin
Patricia E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Livermore, CA 94551
W. Gourdin
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Livermore, CA 94551
A. Gonis
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Livermore, CA 94551
N. Kioussis
Affiliation:
Caliornia State University, Northridge, Department of Physics, Northridge, CA 91330
M. Vaudin
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Ceramics Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

To provide a sensitive measurement of the effect of boron segregation on the strength and ductility of Ni3A1 grain boundaries, bicrystal tensile tests were performed on small specimens of boron doped Ni76A124 cut from extremely large-grained boules. Five specimens with the same “random” or low-symmetry grain boundary (disorientations measured by means of backscattered Kikuchi patterns) and two specimens with a second random grain boundary were tested in quenched and slow-cooled conditions. Duplicate tests performed in a low (7 ppm) water-vapor environment showed that the fracture mode and the stress and strain at fracture are altered by environmental embrittlement at individual, partially strengthened grain boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 319: Symposia CB – Defect-Interface Interactions , 1993 , 393
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liu, C.T., White, C.L., and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 33 (2), 213 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. MacKenzie, R.A.D., Vaudin, M.D., and Sass, S.L. in Interfacial Structure. Properties. and Design, edited by Yoo, M. H., Clark, W. A., and Briant, C. L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 122, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 461–466.Google Scholar
3. Farkas, D., Jang, H., Lewus, M.O., Versaci, R., and Savino, E.J. in Interfacial Structure. Properties. and Design, edited by Yoo, M. H., Clark, W. A., and Briant, C. L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 122, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 455–459.Google Scholar
4. Lin, H. and Pope, D.P. in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys, edited by Johnson, L. A., Pope, D. P., and Stiegler, J. O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 213, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp. 391–396.Google Scholar
5. Meyers, D.E. and Ardell, A.J., Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (9), 2601 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Wan, X.J., Zhu, J.H., and Jing, K.L., Scripta Metall. 26, 473 (1992).Google Scholar
7. George, E.P., Liu, C.T., and Pope, D.P., Scripta Metall. Mater. 28, 857 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Lee, K.H. and White, C.L., Scripta Metall. Mater. 29, 547 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Yoo, M.H., Sass, S.L., Fu, C.L., Mills, M.J., Dimiduk, D.M., and George, E.P., Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (4) 987 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Randle, V., The Measurement of Grain Boundary Geometry (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, and Philadelphia, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
11. Kioussis, N., Watanabe, H., Hemker, R.G., Gourdin, W.H., Gonis, A., and Johnson, P.E., in Interfaces and Point Defects. Seeregation and Precipitation (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., Pittsburgh, PA), in press; also Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, UCRL-JC- 115772 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Mills, M.J., Goods, S.H., Foiles, S.M., and Whetstone, J.R., Scripta Metall. Mater. 25, 1283 (1991).Google Scholar