Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:40:01.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bonded Hydrogen and Trapped H2 in a-Si1−xGex:H Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

E. J. Vanderheiden
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
G. A. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
P. C. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
F. Finger
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, F.R.G.
W. Fuhs
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, F.R.G.
Get access

Abstract

1H NMR has been employed to study the local environments of bonded hydrogen and trapped molecular hydrogen (H2) in a series of a-Si1−xGex:H alloys. There is a monotonic decrease of bonded hydrogen with increasing x from ≈ 10 at. % at x = 0 (a-Si:H) to ≈ 1 at. % at x = 1 (a-Ge:H). The amplitude of the broad 1H NMR line, which is attributed to clustered bonded hydrogen, decreases continuously across the system. The amplitude of the narrow 1H NMR line, which is attributed to bonded hydrogen essentially randomly distributed in the films, decreases as x increases from 0 to ≈ 0.2. From x = 0.2 to x ≈ 0.6 the amplitude of the narrow 1H NMR line is essentially constant, and for x ≥ 0.6 the amplitude decreases once again. The existence of trapped H2 molecules is inferred indirectly by their influence on the temperature dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation times, T1. Through T1, measurements it is determined that the trapped H2 concentration drops precipitously between x = 0.1 and x = 0.2, but is fairly constant for 0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.6. For a-Si:H (x = 0) the H2 concentration is ≈ 0.1 at. %, while for x ≥ 0.2 the concentration of H2 is ≤ 0.02 at. %.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beyer, W., Wagner, H. and Finger, F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 77+78, 857 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Beyer, W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97+98, 1027 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Shimizu, T., Kumeda, M., Morimoto, A., Tsujimura, Y. and Kobayashi, I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol.70 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986), p. 313.Google Scholar
4. VanderHeiden, E.J., Ohlsen, W.D. and Taylor, P.C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 66, 115 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Taylor, P.C. in Semiconductors and Semimetals, 21C Pankove, J., ed. (Academic, New York, 1984), p. 89.Google Scholar
6. Carlos, W.E. and Taylor, P.C., Phys. Rev. B 26, 3605 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Reimer, J.A., Vaughan, R.W. and Knights, J.C., Phys. Rev. B 24, 3360 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Reimer, J.A., Vaughan, R.W. and Knights, J.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 193 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Lohneysen, H.V., Schink, H.J. and Beyer, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 549 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Jeffrey, F.R. and Lowry, M.E., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5529 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Jeffrey, F.R., Lowry, M.E., Garcia, M.C.S., Barres, R.G. and Torgeson, D.E., in AIP Conference Proceedings, 73 (ALP, New York, 1981), p. 83.Google Scholar
12. Conradi, M.S. and Norberg, R.E., Phys. Rev. B 24, 2285 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Beyer, W., private communication.Google Scholar