Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:07:16.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bond Strength of Pressed Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Donald A. Wiegand*
Affiliation:
ARDEC, Picatinny Aresnal, NJ 07806-5000
Get access

Abstract

Composites samples containing 80% and 85% organic filler in a polymer-plastizer binder were produced by mixing, extruding, cutting, drying and pressing. Before pressing the extruded material was in some cases coated with a thin layer of graphite (= one micron) for ease in pressing. As part of a general study of these composites the compressive strength, σm, was determined as a function of temperature, strain rate and the thickness of the graphite coating. Without graphite σm increases with decreasing temperature and increasing strain rate. With graphite σm has the same behavior above approximately −10 C, but is independent of both temperature and strain rate below −10 C for a strain rate of 1.0/Sec. In addition, the low temperature value of Om decreases with increasing graphite thickness. The cracking and fracture patterns are temperature and strain rate dependent and are different with and without graphite. These results indicate that the bond produced by pressing the graphite containing material is stronger than the composite above −10 C and weaker below −10 C so that failure initiates in the composite above −10 C and in the bond below −10 C. With decreasing strain rate this transition temperature decreases. The bonding is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mezgar, M., Straus, B., Moy, S. and Prezelski, J., U. S. Patent No. 4 842 659 (6 June 1989).Google Scholar
2 Wiegand, D.A., Pinto, J. and Nicolaides, S., J. Energetic Materials 9, 19 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Wiegand, D.A., to be published.Google Scholar
4 German, R. M., Powder Metrallurgy Science, (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton , New Jersey, 1984) , p.122.Google Scholar