Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:58.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomimetic Processing of Calcium Carbonate-Chitosan Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Sukun Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, Polymer Science ProgramUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
K. E. Gonsalves
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, Polymer Science ProgramUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA Department of Chemistry, U- 136, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Get access

Extract

Ceramic-polymer composites produced by natural organisms are known to have properties far beyond those that can be achieved in present technological materials [1]. The mollusk shell, for example, starting with relatively weak structural ingredients calcium carbonate and chitin is one such ceramic-polymer composite. In nacre, the overall composite is more than 95 volume percent calcium carbonate, with the remainder an organic matrix of protein and chitin. The inorganic phase consists of highly oriented aragonite platelets forming the bricks and the organic matrix forming the mortar in between [1]. Even though nacre consists of a high amount of the inorganic component, it has excellent fracture toughness and high strength. Studies have been conducted to understand the factors which control the nucleation and orientation of crystallization [2-4]. However, very limited knowledge about the ceramic polymer interfaces, structure, chemistry and whether the interfacial interaction involves ion-binding is known.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Sarikaya, M. and Aksay, I. A., Structure. Cellular Synthesis and Assembly of Biopolymers (Springer-Verlag, Amsterdam, 1992) Chapt. 1, Case, S. (ed) 125 Google Scholar
[2] Weiner, S. and Addadi, L., Trends in Biochemical Science vol. 16 iss 7 pp. 252256 (1988)Google Scholar
[3] Berman, A., Science 259, 5 February 1993 Google Scholar
[4] Mann, S., Nature 334 692695 (1988); Structure and Bonding 54 125-174 (1983), J.Chem. Soc. Faraday 86, 1873-1880 (1990)Google Scholar
[5] R. Austin, P. and Wilmington, D. US Pat. 4,309,534 (1982)Google Scholar
[6] Chibowski, S., Colloid, J. & Interface Sci. 140 No.2 pp. 444449 (1990)Google Scholar
[7] Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley) (1956)Google Scholar
[8] Pearson, F. G., J. Polym. Sci. XLIII, 101116 (1960)Google Scholar
[9] Wagner, C. D., Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Perkin-Elmer (1979)Google Scholar
[10] Andrade, J. D., Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers vol.1 Chapt. 5 (1985)Google Scholar
[11] Clark, D. T., Polymer Surfaces Edited by Clark, D.T. and Feast, W. J. (Wiley & Sons) New York, Chapt.6 (1978)Google Scholar