Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:45:56.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Behavior of Silicon and Boron in the Surface of Corroded Nuclear Waste Glasses: An Eftem Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. C. Buck ,
K. L. Smith  and
M. G. Blackford
E. C. Buck
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory
K. L. Smith
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization
M. G. Blackford
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization
Get access

Abstract

Using electron energy-loss filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM), we have observed the formation of silicon-rich zones on the corroded surface of a West Valley (WV6) glass. This layer is approximately 100-200 nm thick and is directly underneath a precipitated smectite clay layer. Under conventional (C)TEM illumination, this layer is invisible; indeed, more commonly used analytical techniques, such as x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), have failed to describe fully the localized changes in the boron and silicon contents across this region. Similar silicon-rich and boron-depleted zones were not found on corroded Savannah River Laboratory (SRL) borosilicate glasses, including SRL-EA and SRL-51, although they possessed similar-looking clay layers. This study demonstrates a new tool for examining the corroded surfaces of materials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 608: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII , 1999 , 727
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Strachan, D. M., Bourcier, W. L., and McGrail, B. P., Rad. Waste Mgmt. Environ. Res. 19 (1994) 129–145.Google Scholar
[2] Bourcier, W. L., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 333 (1994) 69–82.Google Scholar
[3] Gin, S., Vernaz, E., Jégou, C., and Larche, F., Proc. 18th Inter. Congress on Glass (1998), Section B10 pp. 64–69; G. Berger, C. Claparols, C. Guy, and V. Daux, Geochim. Cosmo. Acta. 58 (1994)4875-4886.Google Scholar
[4] Hofer, F., Grogger, W., Kothleitner, G., and Warbichler, P., Ultramicroscopy, 67 (1997) 83–103.Google Scholar
[5] Bates, J. K., Lam, D. L., and Steindler, M. J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15 (1983) 183–190.Google Scholar
[6] Biwer, B. W., Bates, J. K., Abrajano, T. A., and Bradley, J. P., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176 (1990) 255–263 Google Scholar
[7] Bates, J. K. et al. , ANL Technical Support Program for DOE Office of Environmental Management, Annual Report October 1994- September 1995 ANL-96/11 (1996).Google Scholar
[8] Garvie, L. A. J., Buseck, P. R., and Craven, A. J., Amer. Miner. 80 (1995) 1132–1144.Google Scholar
[9] Fleet, M. E. and Muthupari, S., J. Non Cryst. Sol. 255 (1999) 233–241.Google Scholar
[10] Ebert, W. L., Bates, J. K., and Bourcier, W. L., Waste Mgmt. 11 (1994) 205–221.Google Scholar
[11] Yoreo, J. J. De and Navrotsky, A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (1990) 2068–2072.Google Scholar