Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:23:07.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomistic Study of Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

T. Narita
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan, [email protected]
K. Shintani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes are investigated by means of molecular dynamics simulations. The Tersoff-Brenner potential is used for the calculation of the interatomic forces. Two kinds of simulation cells are considered; one adopts the periodic boundary condition along the tube axis and the other corresponds to tube clusters. The atoms at the ends of a simulation cell are translated along its axis, and the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio are estimated. How these mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes depend on their chiralities is discussed.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Iijima, S., Nature(London) 354, 56 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Saito, R., Dresselhaus, G., and Dresselhaus, M. S., Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (Imperial Colledge Press, London, 1998) p. 35.Google Scholar
3. Yakobson, B. I. and Avouris, Ph., in Carbon Nanotubes, edited by Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., and Avouris, Ph. (Topics Appl. Phys. 80, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001) pp. 287327.Google Scholar
4. Harris, P. J. F., Carbon Nanotubes and Related Structures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999) p. 186212.Google Scholar
5. Krishnan, A., Dujardin, E., Ebbesen, T. W., Yianilos, P. N., and Treacy, M. M. J., Phys. Rev. B 58, 14013 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Wong, E. W., Sheehan, P. E., and Lieber, C. M., Science 277, 1971 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Yakobson, B. I., Brabec, C. J., and Bernholc, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2511 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Brenner, D. W., Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Hernández, E., Goze, C., Bernier, P., and Rubio, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4502 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Sánchez-Portal, D., Artacho, E., Soler, J. M., Rubio, A., and Ordejón, P., Phys. Rev. B 59, 12678 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Robertson, D. H., Brenner, D. W., and Mintmire, J. W., Phys. Rev. B 45, 12592 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Ozaki, T., Iwasa, Y., and Mitani, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1712 (2000).Google Scholar