Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T15:18:43.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomistic And Continuum Studies Of Flaw Tolerant Nanostructuresin Biological Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Markus J. Buehler*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA
Haimin Yao
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA
Baohua Ji
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Huajian Gao
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Get access

Abstract

Bone-like biological materials have achieved superior mechanical properties through hierarchical composite structures of mineral and protein. Geckos and many insects have evolved hierarchical surface structures to achieve superior adhesion capabilities. What is the underlying principle of achieving superior mechanical properties of materials? Using joint atomistic-continuum modeling, we show that the nanometer scale plays a key role in allowing these biological systems to achieve such properties, and suggest that the principle of flaw tolerance and design for robustness may have had an overarching influence on the evolution of the bulk nanostructure of bone-like materials and the surface nanostructure of gecko-like animal species. We illustrate that if the characteristic dimension of materials is below a critical length scale on the order of several nanometers, Griffith theory of fracture no longer holds. An important consequence of this finding is that materials with such nano-substructures become flaw-tolerant, as the stress concentration at crack tips disappears and failure always occurs at the theoretical strength of materials, regardless of defects. The atomistic simulations complement continuum analysis and reveal a smooth transition between Griffith modes of failure via crack propagation to uniform bond rupture at theoretical strength below a nanometer critical length. This modeling resolves a long-standing paradox of fracture theories, and these results have important consequences for understanding failure of small-scale materials. Additional investigations focus on shape optimization of adhesion systems. We illustrate that optimal adhesion can be achieved when the surface of contact elements assumes an optimal shape. The results suggest that optimal adhesion can be achieved either by length scale reduction, or by optimization of the contact shape. Whereas change in shape does not lead to robustness, reducing the dimension results in robust adhesion devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Okumura, K, and de Gennes, P.-G. “Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocomposites with stratified structures”, Europ. Phys. J., Vol. E 4, pp. 121127, 2001.Google Scholar
2. Gao, H, Ji, B, Jaeger, IL, Arzt, E, Fratzl, P, “Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 100, pp. 55975600, 2003.Google Scholar
3. Gao, H, Ji, B, Buehler, MJ, Yao, H, “Flaw tolerant bulk and surface nanostructures of biological systems”, Mechanics and Chemistry of Biosystems, Vol. 1, pp. 512, 2004.Google Scholar
4. Scherge, M, Gorb, SN, Biological Micro and Nano-Tribology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
5. Autumn, K, Sitti, M, Liang, YA, Peattie, AM, Hansen, WR, Sponberg, S, Kenny, TW, Fearing, R, Israelachvili, JN, and Full, RJ, “Evidence for van der Walls adhesion in gecko setae”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 99, pp.1225212256, 2002.Google Scholar
6. Arzt, E, Enders, S, and Gorb, S, “Towards a micromechanical understanding of biological surface devices”, Metallk, Z.., Vol. 93, pp. 345351, 2002.Google Scholar
7. Arzt, E, Gorb, S, Spolenak, R, “From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 100, pp. 1060310606, 2003.Google Scholar
8. Persson, BNJ, “On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems”, J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 118, pp.76147621, 2003.Google Scholar
9. Gao, H, Yao, H, “Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 101, pp. 78517856, 2004.Google Scholar
10. Griffith, AA, “The phenomenon of rupture and flows in solids”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A Vol. 221, pp. 163198, 1921.Google Scholar
11. Roth, J, Gähler, F, Trebin, H-R, “A molecular dynamics run with 5.180.116.000 particles”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, Vol. 11, pp. 317–22, 2000.Google Scholar