Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:33:08.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic-Scale Imaging of Dopant Atom Distributions Within Silicon δ-Doped Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Vanfleet
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
D.A. Muller
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ
H.J. Gossmann
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ
P.H. Citrin
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ
J. Silcox
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Get access

Abstract

We report measurements of the distribution of Sb atoms in σ-doped Si, over a wide 2-D concentration range. Both annular dark-field imaging and electron energy loss spectroscopy proved sufficiently sensitive to locate Sb atoms at the atomic scale. Improvements in both detector sensitivities and specimen preparation were necessary to achieve these results, which offer a surprising explanation for the dramatic difference in electrical activity between 2-D and 3-D dopant distributions at the same effective volume concentrations. The prospects for the general identification of individual dopant atoms will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Current affiliation: Advanced Materials Processing and Analysis Center (AMPAC) and Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL

References

1.Gossmann, H.-J. and Schubert, E.F., Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 18, 167 (1993).Google Scholar
2.Citrin, P.H., Muller, D.A., Gossmann, H.J., Vanfleet, R., and Northrup, P.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3234 (1999).Google Scholar
3.Kirkland, E. J., Thomas, M., A High Efficiency Annular Dark Detector for a VG HB-501 STEM, Ultramicroscopy, 62 (1996) 7988.Google Scholar
4.Klepeis, S.J., Benedict, J.P., and Anderson, R.M. in Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy, Edited by Bravman, J.C., Anderson, R., and McDonald, M.L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 115, Pittsburgh, PA 1988), p. 179.Google Scholar
5.Vanfleet, R.R., Robertson, M., McKay, M., and Silcox, J., Prospects for Single Atom Sensitivity Measurements of Dopant Levels in Silicon, in ‘Characterization and Metrology for ULSI Technology: 1998 International Conference” edited by Seiler, D.G., Diebold, A.C., Bullis, W.M., Shaffner, T.J., McDonald, R., and Walters, E.J., (AIP press, 1998).Google Scholar
6.Calculated with data in: Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, Egerton, R.F., Plenum Press, New York 1996.Google Scholar