Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:41:52.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomically Resolved STM Images of CVD Grown Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Daniel Chiang
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA 98686–9600
Philip Zifeng Lei
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA 98686–9600
Lifeng Dong
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207–0751
Jun Jiao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207–0751
Get access

Abstract

Atomically resolved images of single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNT) grown in a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber were obtained with the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) under ambient conditions. We found that the average diameters d of the CVD-grown CNTs appear to fall into a bimodal distribution of 1.0 and 0.6 nm, and the chiral angle Ø was observed to be close to zero degree. The summation of the lattice indices (n+m) was determined to be 14 and 9 for d= 1.0nm and d= 0.6nm, respectively. The most possible lattice index pairs (n, m) with a chiral angle close to zero degree are (7, 7) and (5, 4), which indicates that the larger nanotubes are metallic and the smaller nanotubes are semi-conductive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thostenson, E. T., and Chou, T.-W., J. Phys. D: Apply. Phys. 35, L77L80 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Biros, L. P., Mark, G. I., Gyulai, J., and Thiry, P. A., Materials Structure 6 2, 104 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Charlier, J.-C., and Lambin, Ph., Phys. Rev. B 57, 57 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Odom, T. W., Huang, J. L, and Lieber, C. M., J. Phys.: Condens. Mat 14, R145R167 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Venema, L. C., Meunier, V., Lambin, Ph., and Dekker, C., Phys. Rev. B 61, 2991 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Castrucci, P., Scarselli, M., De Crescenzi, M., El Khakani, M. A., Rosei, F., Braidy, N., and Yi, J.-H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3857 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Daenen, M., de Fouw, R. D., Hamers, B., Janssen, P. G. A., Shouteden, K., and Veld, M. A. J. in The Wondrous World of Carbon Nanotubes, Eindhoven University of Technology (2003).Google Scholar
8. Dong, L. F., Jiao, J., Foxley, S., Mosher, C. L., and Tuggle, D. W., Nanosci, J.. Nanotechno., 2, 155 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Dong, L. F., Jiao, J., Mosher, C. L., and Foxley, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 728, 121(S8.21) (2002).Google Scholar
10. Chiang, D., to be submitted in J. Vac. Sci.Google Scholar