Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:40:43.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic Force Microscopy Calibration Methods for Lateral Force, Elasticity, and Viscosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. K. Buenviaje ,
S.-R. Ge ,
M. H. Rafailovich  and
R. M. Overney
C. K. Buenviaje
Affiliation:
Dept of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1750
S.-R. Ge
Affiliation:
Dept of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1750
M. H. Rafailovich
Affiliation:
Dept of Material Science., State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275
R. M. Overney
Affiliation:
Dept of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1750
Get access

Abstract

Due to huge uncertainties in the geometric dimensions of atomic force microscopy (AFM) probes, samples' rheological properties and lateral forces are difficult to measure and compare quantitatively. Hence, mathematical calibration methods fail to calibrate AFM probes accurately. To solve this problem, we will introduce in this paper “blind calibration methods” to determine quantitatively lateral forces, elastic constants and viscosity. For lateral force, a geometry factor is used to calibrate any cantilever using this “blind method”. The essential part of this method is a calibration standard sample that is commercially available. We have chosen silicon for our calibration standard sample and will discuss a cleaning procedure for reproducible lateral force measurements. We will provide an absolute friction value, which will serve as one of three parameters necessary to obtain the geometry factor. The other two components being the normal spring constant and the relative friction signal measured with the cantilever of interest. Further, we will discuss force modulation measurements and the problems that occur around resonances. We will provide a procedure to determine elastic constants also based on the silicon calibration standard. Finally, the “blind calibration method” will also be used to achieve kinematic viscosity values.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 522: Symposium T – Fundamentals of Nanoindentation & Nanotribology , 1998 , 187
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Binnig, I. G., Quate, C.F., Ch. Gerber, Phys. Rev Lett. 56, 930–933 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Buenviaje, C.K., Ge, S., Rafailovich, M.H., Sokolov, J., Drake, J.M., Pictroski, C.F., Overney, R.M., Langmuir, submitted (1998).Google Scholar
3. Overney, R.M., Meyer, E., Frommer, J., Guentherodt, H.-J., Fujihira, M., Takano, H., Gotoh, Y., Langmuir 10, 1281–1286 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Overney, R.M., Leta, D.P., Pictroski, C.F., Rafailovich, M.H., Liu, Y., Quinn, J., Sokolov, J., Eisenberg, A, Overney, G., Phys. Rev Lett. 76, 1272–1275 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Overney, R.M., Guo, L., Totsuka, H., Rafailovich, M., Sokolov, J., Schwarz, S.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 464, 133–144 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Hutter, J.L., Bechhoefer, J., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868–1873 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Cleveland, J., Manne, S., Bocek, D., Hansma, P.K., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 403–405 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Kiridena, W., Jain, V., Kuo, P.K., Liu, G., SIA (in press).Google Scholar
9. Overney, R.M. and Drake, J.M., (work in progress).Google Scholar