Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:57:51.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Copper Smelting at Itziparátzico, Michoacan, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Blanca E. Maldonado
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University
Thilo Rehren
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London
Paul R. Howell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

Mesoamerican copper metallurgy emerged in West Mexico sometime between A.D. 600 and 800. Over a period of approximately 900 years a wide variety of artifacts, typically decorations and other valuable non-utilitarian goods, were produced. By A.D. 1450, the Tarascan kingdom in the state of Michoacan had become the most important center of pre-Hispanic metalworking. Metallurgy played a significant role in the structure of political and economic power in the Tarascan Empire. Metal adornments used as insignia of social status and public ritual became even more associated with political power. While metal was used for an array of goods, virtually nothing is known about the manufacture and the organization of production of this material. Archaeological research at the site of Itziparátzico, near the modern Tarascan community of Santa Clara del Cobre, has recently located potential production areas where concentrations of smelting slag were recorded.

The smelting of ores is almost invariably related to the formation of slags, which form from the various impurities introduced into the smelting process, such as gangue minerals, furnace wall material, and fuel ash. Slag analysis thus has the potential for revealing important information about metallurgical technology. Copper smelting slag recovered from the excavations at Itziparátzico has been analyzed for microstructure and compositional properties using light microscopy, x-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS). Preliminary results indicate a smelting technology that used sulfidic ores and highly efficient furnaces. While further archaeological investigations are required to precisely date these activities, this technological information is important for establishing the context and scale of production of copper at the site.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Solís, F., Tesoros Artísticos del Museo Nacional de Antropología, México. M. Aguilar Editor, S.A. de C.V. (1991).Google Scholar
2. Gorenstein, S. and Pollard, H.P., The Tarascan Civilization: A Late Prehispanic Cultural System. Publications in Anthropology 28, Nashville (1983).Google Scholar
3. Grinberg, D., Los Señores del Metal: Minería y Metalurgia en Mesoamérica. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Mexico (1990).Google Scholar
4. Grinberg, D., “El Lienzo de Jucutacato y el Legajo 1204, Ramo Indiferente General del Archivo General de Indias”, Códices y Documentos sobre México: Segundo Simposio, ed. Smithers, Rueda, Sosa, Vega, and Baracs, Martínez (INAH, 1997), pp. 381396.Google Scholar
5. Hosler, D., The Sounds and Colors of Power: The Sacred Metallurgical Technology of Ancient West Mexico. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994).Google Scholar
6. Pollard, H.P., Tariacuri's Legacy: The Prehispanic Tarascan State. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman (1993).Google Scholar
7. Pollard, H.P., Recent Research in West Mexican Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 5 (4), pp. 345384 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Pollard, H.P., The Political Economy of Prehispanic Tarascan Metallurgy. American Antiquity 52 (4), pp. 741752 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Warren, J.B., Minas de Cobre de Michoacán, 1533. Anales del Museo Michoacano 6, pp. 3552 (1968).Google Scholar
10. Map 2 was produced and generously provided by Dr. Hans Roskam, El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora, Mexico.Google Scholar
11. Gilead, I. and Rosen, S., New Evidence for the Beginnings of Metallurgy in the Levant Based on Recent Excavations at Tell Abu Matar. IAMS Newsletter 18, pp. 1114 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Golden, J., Levy, T.E. and Hauptmann, A., Recent Discoveries Concerning Chalcolithic Metallurgy at Shiqmim, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science 28, pp. 951963 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Shalev, S. and Northover, P.J., “The Chacolithic Metal and Metalworking from Shiqmim”, in Shiqmim I, ed. Levy, T.E. (British Archaeological Reports, 1987), pp. 357371.Google Scholar
14. Bachmann, H.G., The Identification of Slags from Archaeological Sites. Institute of Archaeology Occasional Publication No. 6 (1982).Google Scholar
15. Meyerdirks, U., Rehren, Th., and Harvey, A., “Reconstructing the Early Medieval Copper Smelting at Ross Island”, in Ross Island. Mining, Metal and Society in Early Ireland, ed. O'Brien, W. (National University of Ireland, 2004), pp.651664.Google Scholar
16. Veldhuijzen, H.A., ‘Slag_Fun’, A New Tool for Archaeometallurgy: Development of an Analytical (P)ED-XRF Method for Iron-Rich Materials. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 14, pp. 102118 (2003).Google Scholar