Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:10:56.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Solid Phase Epitaxy for Measuring Dangling Bond Densities and Impurity Ionization in Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R. M. Walser  and
Young-Jin Jeon
R. M. Walser
Affiliation:
J.H. Herring Centennial Professor in Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX. 78712, U.S.A.
Young-Jin Jeon
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Center for Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX. 78712, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

According to a recent model [1], the enhancement in the rate of the solid phase epitaxial regrowth (SPER) of silicon produced by implanted impurities is determined by the superposition of reconstruction at sites that capture neutral, and ionized, three-fold coordinated dangling bond states. Considerable support for this model is derived from experiments on ionization-enhanced SPER in silicon. In this paper we discuss how this dangling bond model (DBM) could be used to determine the densities of neutral dangling bonds and ionized impurities in amorphous silicon from these experimental results. Both densities, determined by a self-consistent calculation, are in good agreement with those measured by other types of experiments. This result provides further support for the DBM and indicates that simultaneous SPER and ESR measurements could make it possible to depth profile low concentrations of ionized impurities in amorphous silicon.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 205: Symposium F – Kinetics of Phase Transformations , 1990 , 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Walser, R.M. and Jeon, Y-J., to be published.Google Scholar
2. Park, W.W., Becker, M.F., and Walser, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1517 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Jeon, Y-J., Park, W.W., Becker, M.F., and Walser, R.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 128, 551 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jeon, Y-J., Becker, M.F., and Walser, R.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 157, 745 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Jeon, Y-J., Becker, M.F., and Walser, R.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 152, 653 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Spaepen, F. and Turnbull, D., AIP Conf. Proc. 50, 73 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bourgoin, J.C. and Germain, P., Phys. Lett. 54A, 444 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Muller, G., Kalbitzer, S., and Mannsperger, H., Appl. Phys. A39, 243 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Waddell, C.N., Spitzer, W.G., Fredrickson, J.E., Hubler, G.K., and Kennedy, T.A., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 4361 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Muller, G. and Kalbitzer, S., Phil. Mag. B338, 241 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Spear, W.E. and Le, P.G. Comber, Phil. Mag. 31, 935 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Park, W.W., Becker, M.F., and Walser, R.M., J. Mater. Res. 3, 298 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar