Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:03:10.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anomalous Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Characterization of Model Pressure Vessel Alloy Microstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Dale E. Alexander
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
B. J. Kestel
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
P. R. Jemian
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinoisat Urbana-Champaign, UNICAT, Argonne, IL 60439
G. R. Odette
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106
D. Klingensmith
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106
D. GRAGG
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106
Get access

Abstract

Anomalous small-angle x-ray scattering (ASAXS) experiments were performed at energies near the Mn-K and Fe-K absorption edges on an Fe-0.9 Cu wt.%-1.0 Mn wt.% alloy subjected to either annealing at 450°C, 24 hrs or irradiation with 10 MeV electrons to 0.5 mdpa at 300°C. A Guinier analysis of the net scattered intensity revealed scatterers with radii of 16.5.16.8 Å and 16.4.17.3 Å for the irradiated and annealed foils, respectively. The variation in net scattered intensity with photon energy in the annealed sample was consistent with scattering contrast variations expected for Cu-rich, Cu-Mn precipitates. Minimal variation in net intensity (scattering contrast) with energy determined that Cu-Mn precipitates were not detected in the irradiated sample.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Mathon, M.H., Barbu, A., Dunstetter, F., Maury, F., Lorenzelli, N., and Novion, C.H. de, J. Nucl. Mater. 245, 224 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Charleux, M., Livet, F., Bley, F., Loucet, F., and Brechet, Y., Phil. Mag. A 73, 883 (1996).Google Scholar
[3] Jemian, P.R., Weertman, J.R., Long, G.G., and Spal, R.D., Acta. Metall. Mater. 39, 2477 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Grosse, M., Eichorn, F., Bohmert, J., Brauer, G., Haubold, H.-G., and Goerigk, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 97, 487 (1995).Google Scholar
[5] Odette, G.R. and Lucas, G.E., Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids 144, 189 (1998).Google Scholar
[6] Alexander, D.E., Odette, G.R., Lucas, G.E., and Rehn, L.E. in Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Phase Transformations, edited by Im, J.S., Park, B., Greer, A.L. and Stephenson, G.B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 398, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) p. 177.Google Scholar
[7] Lucas, G.E. and Odette, G.R. in Proc. Second Int. Symp. On Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Reactors - Water Reactors, edited byRoberts, J.T.A., Weeks, J.R. and Theus, G.J., (American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL, 1986) p.345.Google Scholar
[8] Porod, G., Chap. 2, "General Theory", in Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Glatter, O. and Kratky, O., eds. (Academic Press, London, 1982).Google Scholar
[9] Odette, G.R., unpublished research.Google Scholar
[10] Barbu, A., Mathon, M.H., Maury, F., Belliard, J.F., Beuneu, B., Novion, C.H. de, J. Nucl. Mater. 257, 206 (1998).Google Scholar