Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T23:23:35.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anisotropic Displacement Threshold Energies in Silicon by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

LeAnn A. Miller
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
David K. Brice
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
Anil K. Prinja
Affiliation:
university of New Mexico, Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Albuquerque, NM
S. Thomas Picraux
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
Get access

Abstract

A combination of molecular dynamics simulations and theoretical modeling was used to examine the orientation dependent threshold energies for displacement of silicon atoms from their lattice site due to energetic particle collisions. These results are important for a detailed understanding of both radiation effects in silicon devices and beam-enhanced stimulation of molecular beam epitaxial growth.

The molecular dynamics code developed for this study, which employs a Tersoff interaction potential, as well as the theoretical model that incorporates the symmetry of the crystal are described.

Bulk displacement threshold energies were determined by the molecular dynamics code for four directions through the open face in the <111>. These values were then incorporated into the theoretical model for the average bulk displacement threshold energy. The average bulk displacement threshold energy was found to be 14.8 eV in 30° about <111> and 11.1 eV in 20° about <100>.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See, for example, Corbett, J. W., “Electron Radiation Damage in Semiconductors and Metals”, Solid State Physics, Supplement 7, Academic Press, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
2. Hemment, P. L. F. and Stevens, P. R. C., Radiation Effects in Semiconductors, Proceedings of the Santa Fe Conference on Radiation Effects in Semiconductors October 3–5, 1967, 290.Google Scholar
3. Tsao, J. Y., Chason, E., Horn, K. M., Brice, D. K., and Picraux, S. T., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., B39 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. B 39 (8), 55665568, (1989).Google Scholar
5. Smith, R. and Harrison, D. E. Jr., Computers in Physics, Sep/Oct, 68–73, (1989).Google Scholar
6. Watkins, G. D., Radiation Effects in Semiconductors, Proceedings of the Santa Fe Conference on Radiation Effects in Semiconductors October 3–5, 1967, 67.Google Scholar
7. See, for example, Point Defects in Solids. Volume 2 Semiconductors and Molecular Crystals, Ed. by Crawford, J. H. Jr. and Slifkin, L. M., (Plenum, New York, 1975), p.102, et. seq.Google Scholar
8. Hemment, P. L. F. and Stevens, P. R. C., in Atomic Collision Phenomena in Solids, Ed. by Palmer, D. W., Thompson, M. W., and Townsend, P. d. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970), p. 280.Google Scholar
9. Vook, F. L. and Stein, H. J., Rad Effects 6 (1970) 9.Google Scholar