Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:42.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of the Interface Between Plasma-Sprayed Calcium Phosphate Coating and Ti-6Al-4V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Eunsung Park
Affiliation:
New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802.
David T. Hoelzer
Affiliation:
New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802.
Robert A. Condrate Sr
Affiliation:
New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802.
Get access

Abstract

Plasma sprayed calcium phosphate coatings on Ti(alloy) have been considered advantageous over the uncoated Ti as dental implants or orthopedic prostheses due to their abilities to decrease healing time, attach firmer to the bone, and inhibit ion release from the Ti substrate. However, the coating was found not to adhere well to the Ti substrate, presumably because there is no or little chemical bonding between the calcium phosphate coating and the Ti substrate. The interfacial bond strength relies almost entirely on the mechanical locking of calcium phosphate splats onto the roughened Ti surface. In this study, the interfacial area between the calcium phosphate coating and the Ti-6A1–4V substrate was characterized using SEM and TEM. The results revealed the presence of amorphous calcium phosphate layer at the interface, which is believed to be responsible for the low bond strength. Also small particles were observed which were embedded in the amorphous phase near the interface. The presence of the amorphous phases is very important since they are more easily attacked by the physiological solution than crystalline phases are.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jarcho, M., Clin. Ortho. Rel. Res., 157, p. 259 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Ducheyne, P., Healy, K., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2, p. 1137 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Weinlaender, M., Beumer, J. III, Kenney, E.B., Moy, P.K., and Adar, F., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 3, 397 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Klein, C. P. A. T., de Blieck-Hogervorst, J. M. A., Wolke, J. G. C., and de Groot, K., in Ceramics in Substitutive and Reconstructive Surgery, edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier, Netherland, 1991), 363374.Google Scholar
5. Spivik, J. M., Ricci, J. L., Blumenthal, N. C. and Alexander, H., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 24, 1121 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Yang, C. Y., Wang, B. C., Change, E., Wu, B. C., J. Mater. Sci., Mater. Med., 6, 258 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Van Raemdonck, W., Ducheyne, P., and De Meester, P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 67, 381 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Ducheyne, P., Van Raemdonck, W., Heugherbaert, J. C., and Heugherbaert, M., Biomaterials, 7, 97 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Filiaggi, M. J., Coombs, N. A., and Pilliar, R. M., MRS Symp. Proc, 153, 377 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Ji, H. and Marquis, P. M., in Ceramics in Substitutive and Reconstructive Surgery. edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier, Netherland, 1991), 295302.Google Scholar