Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:27:23.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Residual Stress in Polycrystalline Silver Thin Films by X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. L. Alford
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering
Yuxiao Zeng
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering
Y. L. Zou
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering
F. Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
S. S. Lau
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
T. Laursen
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
B. Manfred Ullrich
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
Get access

Abstract

The stress state of evaporated Ag films prepared on Ti underlayers before and after encapsulation process has been studied by x-ray diffraction using a “sin2ψ” technique. A low tensile stress of approximately 61 MPa was measured in the as-deposited Ag films. The stress was caused by nonequilibrium growth during film deposition and resulted in a lattice tension state in the film plane and a lattice compression state along the film normal. Thermal mismatch stress was produced by the encapsulation process at 600 °C, but most of this stress relaxed during the cooling stage, and a residual tensile stress of ∼ 320 MPa in the film plane was determined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Alford, T. L., Adams, Daniel, Laursen, T., and Manfred Ullrich, B., Appl. Phys. Lett 68, 3251(1996).Google Scholar
[2] Zoux, Y. L., Alford, T. L., Adams, D., Laursen, T., Tu, K. -N., and Lau, S. S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 427, 355 (1996).Google Scholar
[3] Laursen, T., Adams, D., Alford, T. L., Tu, K. -N., Deng, F., Morton, R., and Lau, S. S., Thin Solid films, 290, 411 (1996).Google Scholar
[4] Iijima, T., Ono, H., Ninomiya, N., Ushiku, Y., Hatahaka, T., Nishiyama, A. and Iwai, H., in Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials, Makuhari, 1993, p. 183.Google Scholar
[5] Russell, S. W., Rafalski, S. A., Spreitzer, R. L., Li, J., Moinour, M., Moghadam, F. and Alford, T. L., Thin Solid films, 262, 154 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Adams, D., Alford, T. L., Theodore, N. D., Russell, S. W., Spreitzer, R. L., and Mayer, J. W., Thin Solid films, 262, 199 (1995).Google Scholar
[7] Nix, W. D., Metall. Tran. A 20, 2217 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Sharma, S. K. and Spitz, J., Thin Solid films, 65, 339 (1980).Google Scholar
[9] Noyan, I. C. and Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
[10] Vinci, R. P., Zielinski, E. M., and Bravman, J. C., Thin Solid films, 262, 142 (1995).Google Scholar
[11] Shibata, H., Murata, M., and Hashimoto, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 4479 (1993).Google Scholar
[12] Tsukada, M. and Ohfuji, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, 326 (1993).Google Scholar
[13] Zeng, Yuxiao, Zou, Y. L., and Alford, T. L., submitted to Thin Solid films.Google Scholar
[14] Flinn, P. A. and Chiang, Chien, J. Appl. Phys. 67, 2927 (1990).Google Scholar
[15] Zeng, Yuxiao, Zou, Y. L., Alford, T. L., Deng, F., Lau, S. S., Laursen, T., and Manfred Ullrich, B., J. Appl. Phys., inpress. Google Scholar
[16] D'Heurle, F. M. and Harper, J. M. E., Thin Solid films, 171, 81(1989).Google Scholar