Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:38:37.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Electrostatic Effects on the Success of Retroviral-Mediated Gene Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Howard E. Davis ,
Jeffrey R. Morgan  and
Martin L. Yarmush
Howard E. Davis
Affiliation:
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A
Jeffrey R. Morgan
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering in Medicine/Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Shriners Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A
Martin L. Yarmush
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering in Medicine/Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Shriners Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Recombinant retroviruses are a commonly used gene delivery tool in human gene therapy clinical trials as they permanently integrate the therapeutic DNA into the genome of the target cell. Despite their widespread use, however, retroviral gene transfer efficiencies remain disappointingly low. In the years since their initial development as vectors, it has become clear that the physicochemical properties of the recombinant retrovirus, as well as the properties of the target tissue, have a major impact on the success of gene transfer. In particular, the interaction between the native negative charge present on the vector and target cell membranes results in a significant electrostatic barrier which must be overcome in order for the transduction process to begin. Using a recently developed retrovirus adsorption assay, we have demonstrated that this electrostatic interaction is the dominant interaction during the initial steps of transduction. We have also established that cationic polymers enhance adsorption, and ostensibly transduction, by neutralizing this electrostatic barrier. Interestingly, we also found that this enhanced adsorption could be demonstrated even in the absence of a cellular receptor for the virus, suggesting that the first step of transduction does not involve binding of the virus to currently identified receptors, but is either a non-specific adsorption process or involves binding to an, as of yet, uncharacterized class of receptor. Based upon our finding that virus adsorption is non-gp70 mediated, we propose a new physical model of this initial step of transduction which is diffusion-limited, receptor and envelope independent, and modulable by positively charged compounds. Our findings may have significant implications for other gene and drug delivery systems which interact directly with target tissues at the level of the cell membrane.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 662: Symposia LL/MM/NN/OO – Biomaterials for Drug Delivery & Tissue Engineering , 2000 , NN3.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ORDA Report: Human Gene Therapy Protocols,. 1999, Office of Recombinant DNA Activities, NIH, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W. F., Human gene therapy. Nature, 1998. 392: p. 25–30.Google Scholar
3. Crystal, R. G., Transfer of genes to humans: early lessons and obstacles to success. Science, 1995. 270: p. 404–10.Google Scholar
4. Friedmann, T., The maturation of human gene therapy. Acta Paediatr, 1996. 85: p. 1261–5.Google Scholar
5. Verma, I. M. and Somia, N., Gene therapy -- promises, problems and prospects. Nature, 1997. 389: p. 239–42.Google Scholar
6. Coelen, R. J., Jose, D. G., and May, J. T., The effect of hexadimethrine bromide (polybrene) on the infection of the primate retroviruses SSV 1/SSAV 1 and BaEV. Arch Virol, 1983. 75: p. 307–11.Google Scholar
7. Manning, J. S., Hackett, A. J., and Darby, N. B. Jr., Effect of polycations on sensitivity of BALB-3T3 cells to murine leukemia and sarcoma virus infectivity. Appl Microbiol, 1971. 22: p. 1162–3.Google Scholar
8. Toyoshima, K. and Vogt, P. K., Enhancement and inhibition of avian sarcoma viruses by polycations and polyanions. Virology, 1969. 38: p. 414–26.Google Scholar
9. Coller, B. S., Polybrene-induced platelet agglutination and reduction in electrophoretic mobility: enhancement by von Willebrand factor and inhibition by vancomycin. Blood, 1980. 55: p. 276–81.Google Scholar
10. Dhawan, J., Pan, L. C., Pavlath, G. K., Travis, M. A., Lanctot, A. M., and Blau, H. M., Systemic delivery of human growth hormone by injection of genetically engineered myoblasts. Science, 1991. 254: p. 1509–12.Google Scholar
11. Morgan, J. R., LeDoux, J. M., Snow, R. G., Tompkins, R. G., and Yarmush, M. L., Retrovirus infection: effect of time and target cell number. J Virol, 1995. 69: p. 6994–7000.Google Scholar
12. Evans, L. H., Morrison, R. P., Malik, F. G., Portis, J., and Britt, W. J., A neutralizable epitope common to the envelope glycoproteins of ecotropic, polytropic, xenotropic, and amphotropic murine leukemia viruses. J Virol, 1990. 64: p. 6176–83.Google Scholar
13. Lane, D. and Harlow, E., Antibodies : a laboratory manual. 1988, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. xiii, 726.Google Scholar
14. Forestell, S. P., Bohnlein, E., and Rigg, R. J., Retroviral end-point titer is not predictive of gene transfer efficiency: implications for vector production. Gene Ther, 1995. 2: p. 723–30.Google Scholar
15. Kadan, M. J., Sturm, S., Anderson, W. F., and Eglitis, M. A., Detection of receptor-specific murine leukemia virus binding to cells by immunofluorescence analysis. J Virol, 1992. 66: p. 2281–7.Google Scholar
16. Kurre, P., Kiem, H. P., Morris, J., Heyward, S., Battini, J. L., and Miller, A. D., Efficient transduction by an amphotropic retrovirus vector is dependent on high-level expression of the cell surface virus receptor. J Virol, 1999. 73: p. 495–500.Google Scholar
17. Pizzato, M., Marlow, S. A., Blair, E. D., and Takeuchi, Y., Initial binding of murine leukemia virus particles to cells does not require specific Env-receptor interaction. J Virol, 1999. 73: p. 8599–611.Google Scholar
18. Coffin, J. M., Hughes, S. H., and Varmus, H. E., Retroviruses. 1997, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 71–119.Google Scholar
19. Schlegel, R., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I. H., Saturable binding sites for vesicular stomatitis virus on the surface of Vero cells. J Virol, 1982. 43: p. 871–5.Google Scholar
20. Piraino, F., The mechanism of genetic resistance of chick embryo cells to infection by Rous sarcoma virus-BRYAN strain (BS-RSV). Virology, 1967. 32: p. 700.Google Scholar
21. Notter, M. F., Leary, J. F., and Balduzzi, P. C., Adsorption of Rous sarcoma virus to genetically susceptible and resistant chicken cells studied by laser flow cytometry. J Virol, 1982. 49: p. 345–8.Google Scholar
22. Marin, M., Noel, D., Valsesia-Wittman, S., Brockly, F., Etienne-Julan, M., Russell, S., Cosset, F. L., and Piechaczyk, M., Targeted infection of human cells via major histocompatibility complex class I molecules by Moloney murine leukemia virus-derived viruses displaying single-chain antibody fragment-envelope fusion proteins. J Virol, 1996. 70: p. 2957–62.Google Scholar
23. Martin, F., Kupsch, J., Takeuchi, Y., Russell, S., Cosset, F. L., and Collins, M., Retroviral vector targeting to melanoma cells by single-chain antibody incorporation in envelope. Hum Gene Ther, 1998. 9: p. 737–46.Google Scholar
24. Gunzburg, W. H., Fleuchaus, A., Saller, R., and Salmons, B., Retroviral vector targeting for gene therapy. Cytokines Mol Ther, 1996. 2: p. 177–84.Google Scholar
25. Harris, J. D. and Lemoine, N. R., Strategies for targeted gene therapy. Trends Genet, 1996. 12: p. 400–5.Google Scholar
26. Cosset, F. L. and Russell, S. J., Targeting retrovirus entry. Gene Ther, 1996. 3: p. 946–56.Google Scholar
27. Yu, H., Soong, N., and Anderson, W. F., Binding kinetics of ecotropic (Moloney) murine leukemia retrovirus with NIH 3T3 cells. J Virol, 1995. 69: p. 6557–62.Google Scholar