Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:08:47.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An In-Situ Study of Crack Propagation in Binary Lamellar TiAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

P. Wang
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
N. Bhate
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
K.S. Chan
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
K.S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Get access

Abstract

Single-colony thick compact tension specimens of binary lamellar Ti-46.5%Al were tested within a scanning electron microscope to examine the contribution of colony boundaries to crack growth resistance under monotonic loads. These specimens were obtained by machining slices from bulk material that had been heat treated to grow the colony size. Thus, the lamellae in adjacent colonies exhibit significant misorientation across the boundary. The orientation of the lamellae within a colony has been characterized in terms of two angles defined with respect to the notch orientation: an in-plane angle β and a through thickness angle β. The change in these two angles across the colony boundary quantifies the misorientation. In addition a third angle, ö, defines the colony boundary tilt to the vertical plane. These parameters were measured in several specimens and the crack growth resistance across the boundary was qualitatively and quantitatively characterized. The importance of the through-thickness angle β in providing resistance to crack growth is illustrated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238

References

REFERENCES

1. Chan, K.S. and Kim, Y-W., Metall. and Mater. Trans., 25A, 1217 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Chan, K.S. and Kim, Y-W., Acta Metall. Mater., 43, 439 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Chan, K.S. and Shih, D.S., Metall. and Mater. Trans., 28A, 79 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Mitao, S., Isawa, T. and Tsuyama, S., Scripta Metall. Mater., 26, 1405 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Chan, K.S., Onstott, J. and Kumar, K.S., Metall. Mater. Trans., 31A, 71 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Arata, J.J.M., Needleman, A., Kumar, K.S. and Curtin, W.A., Int. Jour. Frac., 105, 321 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Chan, K.S. and Cruse, T.A., Eng. Frac. Mech., 23, 863874 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Yoshioka, S., Miyazaki, M., Watanabe, K., Kitagawa, H. and Hirano, Y.: from the Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Volume 2; Editor-in-Chief: Murakami, Y., The Society of Materials Science, Japan. Pergamon Press, New York, 1987, p. 833.Google Scholar