Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:30:44.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amorphous Silicon Active Pixel Sensor Readout Circuit Architectures for Medical Imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

K.S. Karim
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
A. Nathan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
J.A. Rowlands
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Center, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Results from previous work indicate the feasibility of the amorphous silicon (a-Si) active pixel sensor (APS) readout circuit that performs on-pixel amplification for low-noise, real time imaging applications (e.g. fluoroscopy). In this paper, the noise contribution of the APS readout circuit is examined. In addition, due to the metastable nature of a-Si, the APS stability is discussed. Unlike conventional PPS systems with one thin film transistor (TFT) switch per pixel, the APS has three TFTs per pixel. The large number and sizes of a-Si TFTs can reduce the pixel fill factor if the TFTs are not embedded beneath the sensor as in continuous layer sensor architectures. In this paper, we present preliminary APS noise and stability measurements along with considerations of fully overlapped pixel architectures on APS performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Karim, K.S., Nathan, A., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett., 22(10), 469 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Karim, K.S., Nathan, A., Rowlands, J.A., “Feasibility of current mediated amorphous silicon active pixel sensor readout circuits for large area diagnostic medical imaging,” in Proc. SPIE Opto Canada, Ottawa, Canada, May 9-10, 2002, in press.Google Scholar
3. Boudry, J.M. and Antonuk, L.E., J. App. Phys., 76, 2529 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Rhayem, J., Rigaud, D., Valenza, M., Szydlo, N., Lebrun, H., J. Appl. Phys., 87(4), 1983 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Karim, K.S., Nathan, A., Rowlands, J.A. in Proc. SPIE, International Symposium on Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, 4320, 35 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Keshner, M.S., Proc. IEEE, 70, 212 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Degerli, Y., Lavernhe, F., Magnan, P., Farre, J.A., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., 47(5), 949 (2000).Google Scholar
8. van Berkel, C. and Powell, M. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51(14), 1094 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Chiang, C., Kanicki, J., and Takechi, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 37 (1), 9A, 4704 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Huang, C., Teng, T., Tsai, J. and Cheng, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39(1), 7A, 3867 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Street, R.A., Wu, X.D., Weisfield, R., Ready, S., Apte, R., Nguyen, M., and Nylen, P., MRS Symp. Proc., 377, 757 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Servati, P., Karim, K.S., Nathan, A., “On the effect of top gate on the static characteristics of a-Si:H double-gate TFTs,” submitted.Google Scholar