Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:48:23.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amorphous Diamond-Like Carbon Film Growth by KrF-and Arf-Excimer Laser Pld: Correlation with Plume Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. A. Puretzky ,
D. B. Geohegan ,
G. E. Jellison Jr.  and
M. M. Mcgibbon
A. A. Puretzky
Affiliation:
institute of Spectroscopy, Troitsk, Russia
D. B. Geohegan
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
G. E. Jellison Jr.
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
M. M. Mcgibbon
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

A comparative study of arF- and KrF-laser deposition of amorphous diamond-like carbon (DLC) films and relevant carbon plasmas has been performed. Spectroscopic ellipsometry and EELS analysis of the DLC films deposited on Si <100> and NaCl substrates were utilized to characterize the high quality arF- and KrF-laser deposited films (up to 84% of sp3 bonded carbon in 7 J/cm2 -ArF-laser DLC film). Gated ICCD imaging, luminescence and ion current probe diagnostics of the carbon plume have revealed quite different properties of carbon plasmas generated by arF- and KrF- lasers. KrF-laser (6.7 J/cm2) irradiation produces a less energetic carbon plasma containing larger amounts of C2 and probably larger clusters compared with arF-laser irradiation at the same energy fluence. We conclude that the more energetic and highly-atomized arF-laser carbon plasma results in the better diamond-like properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 388: Symposium Q – Film Synthesis and Growth Using Energetic Beams , 1995 , 145
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pappas, D. L., Saenger, K. L., Bruley, J., Krakov, W., Cuomo, J. J. and Collins, R. W., J. appl. Phys. 71, 5675 (1992).Google Scholar
2 R.Xiong, , wang, Y. Y., Leppert, V., Chang, R. P. H., J. Mater. Res. 8, 2265 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Geohegan, D. B., Thin Solid Films 220, 138 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Geohegan, D. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2732 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Browning, N. D. and Pennycook, S. J., Microbeam analysis 2, 81 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Berger, S. D., McKenzie, D. R., Martin, P. J., Philosophical Magazine Letters 57, 285 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Jellison, G. E. Jr. and Modine, F. A., appl. Optics 29, 959 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Forouhi, A. R. and Bloomer, I., Phys. Rev. B 34, 7018 (1986).Google Scholar
9 Jellison, G. E. Jr., Thin Solid Films 234, 416 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Edwards, D. F. and Philipp, H. R., Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, ed. by Palic, E. D., Academic Press, San-Diego, 1985, p.665 Google Scholar