Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T14:06:03.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aluminum Atom Surface Mobility on SiO2 During Ionized Cluster Beam Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Leonard L. Levenson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Energy Science, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80933-7150
Amy B. Swartzlander
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401
Hiroaki Usui
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Engineering Experimental Laboratory, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan
Isao Yamada
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Engineering Experimental Laboratory, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan
Toshinori Takagi
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Engineering Experimental Laboratory, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan
Get access

Abstract

An ionized cluster beam (ICB) source was used to deposit Al onto SiO2 substrates. A 60 gtm diameter wire held at the substrate served as a mask. After Al deposition, the wire was removed and the masked area was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by scanning Auger microprobe (SAM). The ICB source was operated at 0, 3, and 6 kV acceleration voltages. The substrate was held at 80°, 200°, and 400°C during Al depositions. The Al deposition rate averaged 240 A per min. The chamber pressure during deposition was 2×10-6 Torr. The diffusion distance of Al under the mask edge was determined from the SEM micrographs and SAM line scans. The maximum diffusion distance for all acceleration voltages occured at a substate temperature of 200°C. The maximum diffusion distance at 200°C was 29 μm at 6 kV acceleration voltage. The minimum diffusion distance was 12 μm at 400°C for an acceleration voltage of 6 kV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Movchan, B.A. and Demchishin, A.V., Phys. Met. Metallogr. 28, 83 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11, 666 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Thornton, J.A., An. Rev. Mat. Sci. 7, 239 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4, 3059 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Messier, P., Giri, A.P. and Roy, R.A., J. Vac. Sci Technol. A2, 500 (1984).10.1116/1.572604Google Scholar
6. Hanbucken, M., Doust, T., Osasona, C., Lay, G. Le, and Venables, J.A., Surf. Sci. 168, 133 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Venables, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, 870 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Levenson, L.L., Asano, M., Tanaka, T., Usui, H., Yamada, I., and Takagi, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 1552 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Levenson, L.L., Usui, H., Yamada, I., Takagi, T., and Swatzlander, A.B., to appear in J. Vac. Sci. Technol.Google Scholar
10. Yamada, I., Takaoka, H., Inokawa, H., Usui, H., Cheng, S.C., and Takagi, T., Thin Solid Films, 92, 137 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Takagi, T., Z. Phys. D3, 271 (1986).Google Scholar